Wimbledon SF preview and prediction: Federer vs. Berdych

Roger Federer and Tomas Berdych will be facing each other for the 25th time in their careers when they collide in the Wimbledon semifinals on Friday.

The head-to-head series stands at 18-6 in Federer’s favor, which is actually a respectable number for Berdych. But it has not been competitive of late. Since winning five times in the span of eight meetings from 2010 through 2013, Berdych has lost seven in a row against Federer and the underdog is 1-16 in their last 17 total sets. The Czech did, however, make things interesting earlier this season in Miami; Federer prevailed 6-2, 3-6, 7-6(6) during his run of consecutive Masters 1000 titles.

That came in a stretch that saw the fifth-ranked Swiss go 19-1 in his first 20 matches of 2017. After skipping the clay-court swing and losing his grass-court opener in Stuttgart to Tommy Haas, Federer appears to be back in the same kind of form. He is in the midst of a 10-match winning streak that includes the Halle title and Wimbledon victories over Alexandr Dolgopolov, Dusan Lajovic, Mischa Zverev, Grigor Dimitrov, and Milos Raonic. The 18-time Grand Slam champion is the only one of the four semifinalists who has not surrendered a single set.

Berdych had been mediocre at best prior this fortnight, to the extent that he still won’t be in the top eight in the race to the World Tour Finals if he falls to Federer. But a return trip to the All-England Club was just what the doctor ordered for the world No. 15. The 2010 runner-up and 2016 semifinalist is 42-13 lifetime at this tournament and is back in the semis following defeats of Jeremy Chardy, Ryan Harrison, David Ferrer, Dominic Thiem, and Novak Djokovic–the latter via second-set retirement.

Still, Berdych has not done enough to suggest he can take down Federer, which he did in the 2010 quarterfinals before upsetting Djokovic in the semis and losing to Nadal in the title match. Only his straight-set demolition of Ferrer was a particularly impressive result, and Ferrer is a shadow of his former self at 35 years old.

Berdych’s next 35-year-old foe, on the other hand, is aging like a fine wine. The 11th seed’s favorable draw has come to an end, and his 2017 Wimbledon campaign will likely do the same on Friday.

Pick: Federer in 3

[polldaddy poll=9787628]

161 Comments on Wimbledon SF preview and prediction: Federer vs. Berdych

    • Just because Federer has won 5 matches easily, it doesn’t mean he will win another one or two easily. Imagine the first set goes to a tie break, and Fed loses it! Nerves will set in. And the fact that with all the “main” competitors are now gone, he is the overwhelming favourite, could add to the nerves further. It’s not that easy playing against a big serving guy. If Berdych gets into his groove, and if Fed loses the first set, anything is possible.

      • I think at his level having the main competitors gone is an extra reason to be super focused and motivated. It’s not that the best Murray or Rafa is waiting at the final.. it’s “only” Cilic.
        Just remember that game against Haas, I think Soderling won his game against Rafa when Roger was 0-2 in sets.

  1. This is not so much about who will win in how many sets, but has more to do with the amount of therapy Berdych will need to get him over his post traumatic stress disorder after what Roger does to him tomorrow.

    Poor Tomas.

    • I agree with you, Fg. I think there will be at least 1 tie-break. Berdych has a big serve, so if he has a good first serve percentage he could push it to a tie-break. Even though I think a straight sets defeat is the most likely outcome, I also would not be surprised if it ended up being a close match. As I’ve said before, Rafa and Novak each have the title record at one of the majors, RG and AO respectively, so I think it would be cool if Roger could be the lone record holder of Wimbledon titles. If Fed, Rafa, and Novak are going to go down as arguably the three greatest to ever play the game, then it would fitting for each of them to have the record number of slams at their respective best major tournament. And who knows- maybe Murray can win 5 more US Opens and then the Big 4 would all have the record at one of the majors (joke)!

  2. Berdych will believe mentally that he beat Djokovic which will give him confidence going into this match and the prospect of playing an opponent in the final that he’s capable of beating will motivate him more than ever to fight this tooth and nail all the way. This is familair territory for him also and knows he cant beat Fed in te latter stages of a grand slam and on this surface.

    Fed in 4.

  3. Somehow I wish Fed wins in 4. He needs a kind of ‘alarm’ to be more vigilent and alert in the final. I just want him to be ready for the final.

  4. Poor Berdych, what must and what can he do, in order to win a slam before he retires into the sunset? There’s always someone standing in his way whom he can’t beat.

    Cilic at least could power his way through to get his one and only USO trophy; Delpo too. Berdych plays a similar game and yet he couldn’t do the same.

    Even the late bloomer that is Stan, still could manage to win not one but three slams and two of which not on his fave surface! It’s not like Stan, Delpo and Cilic had it easy when they won their slam(s); they each had to beat either Fed or Rafa or Djoko, or even two of them.

    What’s wrong with Berdych, that what those three could do to win slams but he simply couldn’t?

        • Yeah but it seems to me that Berdych is more susceptible to choking than most other top guys. Double faults at bad times and crucial errors at crucial moments in a lot of his matches even when he’s playing well.

          • Perhaps he’s not good in his court craft, choosing the wrong shots, wrong timing or wrong placement of shots etc. I feel he’s not as good as Delpo or Cilic when moving up to the net, but right now he’s improving in that aspect of his game.

            I feel it’s his decision making that ls the main problem, other than his mental fragility at crucial moments. I also feel that he should also work on his footwork, train to hit with precision while on the run, that’s something the big four are doing so well, i.e. not compromising the precision of their shots even when forced to go on the run or being stretched out wide.

            Berdych is more unfortunate than Delpo and Cilic in that he’s born a few years earlier (3 years) and his prime coincided with that of Rafa’s/Djoko’s, while Fed was still going strong. He’s being in top ten for a long time now, much longer than Stan. Had he be like Stan, i.e. a late bloomer, he may have better chances, when he could capitalize on Rafa’s injury absences and Fed’s decline and only had Djoko as the main obstacle (Berdych used to have relatively good H2H vs Murray). Too bad, he himself is also on a decline.

            Both Cilic and Delpo, with their big game, will have better chances to win some more slam(s) as they’re younger and may outlast the big four in the tour. Berdych imo doesn’t have such luxury.

          • Good points. You’re right Cilic and Del Po still have time. Berdych not so much. I’ve always felt sad for him in this respect. Talent capable of winning slams or at least making more than just one final.

          • Yep, feel sorry for him too. Berdy played a good SF match vs Stan at AO2014, and lost in TB sets! Had he won that one and faced Rafa who injured his back during warm up in the final, perhaps Berdych would have won one slam (that AO2014) by now. Stan still have two slams with him even if he didn’t win that AO title. Too bad for Berdy, it’s not meant to be for him, Stan was simply unstoppable back then!

          • Well guys…Maybe i will sound a little bit mean but…i’m not feel sad at all about Berd…i mean,he’s on tour for how long?12,13,14 years?..he’s got all this years to improve himself…God!He’s one of the player’s that got the huge serve on tour..big,flat groundstrokes…all he needs to do is take care of his mental toughness,fitness etc that will take him to the same level as the Big 4…

            Rafa don’t have a serve like him…and so is Andy..but those guys still find a way to improve themselves all the time…take a look at Andy..only last year he can reach to the pinnacle of his career by reaching No 1 after been put behind by the Great 3 almost his entire career! ..and at the verge of 30 years old nonetheless…If Rafa,Novak and Andy can improve and established themselves after working so hard all this years,why can’t Berd?

            I know it’s easy to talk than to implicate things on court.but,if u choose to be a professional athlete,u have no choice but to find a way to make yourself success especially you’re already involve in this sport 12,13 years ago…

          • H’mmm, what is Berdy’s TB record? He loses a lot of TB’s to Rafa, I know.

            Berdy used to play a LOT of Davis Cup. He and Steps were virtually a 2 man team and won a couple. Wonder how much that took out of him in his best years?

            Eh, Fed in 3.

  5. Federer in three sets. It is possible that he might need a tiebreaker to win one of the sets. Roger is playing really well on grass right now. He was smart to skip the French Open.

  6. I want to give berd one tb. Although I still feel fed in 3 is most probable. Il say fed in 4 final answer with 1 tiebreak to berd.

  7. Berdy please, make Fed run from side to side! He’s not that quick along the baseline as before.

    And, don’t come to the net, please, you’re not going to beat Fed there!

  8. What’s the hurry Berdy? Take your time and concentrates on your first serves, you’re not exceeding the 20secs yet, are you?

  9. Yes, at least holds serve now and restricts the deficit to only one game, find a way through Fed’s service game if you can!

    • Berdy playing well now. That break gave him a lift.

      Good service game from Berdy! Come on, make it a match!

  10. The commentators, Becker being one of them, spoke too soon, saying it is an exhibition match by Fed, ha, now they’re too shock to realize that Fed is having a match on hand!

    • Lucky, to be fair: we all predicted that it would be more or less an exhibition match for Fed. I would be glad, though, if I was wrong…

      • Come on littlefoot, it isn’t an exhibition match so far!

        I for one did not predict that it’s an easy match for Fed. Fed may still win but it’s not going to be easy.

        Fed is not playing as well as in his earlier round matches because Berdy is a big server and hard hitting baseliner.

  11. Fed ain’t playing well as earlier because he is one of the older players on tour. Old age affects everyone no matter who u are. Fed is conserving for the finals maybe or he is just tired.however his skills will carry him for the win.

    • If Berdy could have won the first set TB. That would have given him some belief.

      I just don’t think Berdy is mentally tough enough to beat Fed now. He’s done it on the past, but it’s been a long time.

      Still Berdy is staying in it and making a match of it.

  12. Berdy is really not a very intelligent player, I mean why hit CC all the time right back at Fed when there’s an opening for a DTL shot? Such unintelligent play!

  13. Berdy is moving Fed along the baseline, that’s the right thing to do. Fed is staying in the set because of his serve, he’s tiring.

  14. If Federer can get through this match, it will certainly be good preparation for Cilic, as Berdych and Cilic have pretty similar style of play. The only difference, in my opinion, is that Cilic’s top level is a little better than Berdych’s…

      • Yes, but if he gets through in straight sets it shouldn’t make too much of a difference. Anyway, I don’t think it matters where Fed’s level is at- Cilic is always going to be a very tough match for Fed.

      • He won’t be exhausted lol. He’s gonna win this match in straights now so this is more like a quality workout for him. I know you want him to be tired in the final but as you told me about my Muller pick, you are just hoping.

        • Benny…
          Lucky was hoping that Berdych will take Fed out. Now that Fed is winning she is trying to find some silver lining. Lol ?

          • Mark, you think Berdy could take Fed out? Are you serious?? Lol!
            Please don’t insult my intelligence!

          • Mark, judging by your post, you don’t seem too bright, esp on your speculation about others!

          • Hoping Berdy to beat Fed is not exactly the same thing as to believe that Berdy could take Fed out.

            I said you ‘hoped'(your posts are proof of that)…did I say you ‘believed’?…

            Hope you can see the difference, but frankly I don’t believe. ☺

          • Mark, my post said what? Is it your first time here? Read my earlier posts and see for yourself what I said about Berdy’s chances vs Fed! Please stop posting such unintelligent posts about me, if not you really confirmed that my assessment of you is correct, that you’re lacking something up there!

          • Lol…dear LS, you are only good at hurling personal insults..

            Well…just because I think you are an idiot, do you start believing yourself to be one…

            I ‘hope’ not…
            Do you need more explanation?

          • Mark, you’re the idiot here alright! Not difficult to understand that right, even for your level of ‘intelligence’ up there, right?

            Don’t ever bother me again from now on! Stop assuming what I think or trying to be smart when you’re not!

          • Dear Lucky, sorry.. but, I will continue to post my comments here if I feel like. If you don’t want to be bothered, please ignore my comments.

          • I will ignore your comments alright except those where you mention my name, simple as that! I will not tolerate false assumptions about me or about what I think! So please leave me out of all your future posts, thank you very much!

            I certainly won’t want to engage in such pointless insults when I’m posting here. I don’t know why in the first place you have to provoke me in the first place, I’ve no problem with Benny when we can engage in discussions or arguments but done in cordial manner even if we don’t always agree.

            Deal?

        • Benny, did you see how much Fed had to run in this match? Muller didn’t need to run so much, dear friend! Fed was frustrated at times dealing with Berdy’s big hitting!

          It’s not the length of the match, it’s the running one has to do in the match!

          • I meant how you told me I was hoping when I said Muller would beat Nadal. And you are just coming up with reasons for Fed to lose. Sorry it’s true. Rafa runs a bunch in pretty much every match but I know for a fact you wouldn’t say Rafa will be tired in the final from this match if he was in Fed’s position. Fed will be fresh in the final and there’s literally no evidence to suggest against that. He’s played the least amount of sets you can play to make a final and has moved extremely well in every match. AND HE WON THREE FIVE SETTERS IN MELBOURNE!! Fed with the energy level he had in Melbourne final will win the final on Sunday and he should be WAY more energized than he was there.

          • Benny, you want to compare Fed to Rafa in terms of fitness?? You forget that in AO2009 final, that Fed reached the final without losing a set, but Rafa had a long five sets match in the SF with one less day rest, yet Fed was the one in the final made to run like crazy, and by the fifth set, he was making all the errors and relented and lost.

            Please don’t compare Fed’s fitness to Rafa’s, you can never win that one!

            Again, you people simply are too sensitive when it comes to criticism about Fed. Fed will not get exhausted in the final when it’s a straight set match, either he wins or he loses, but its most likely it’ll go the distance to four or even five sets by which time physical fatigue may set in. I don’t see there’s anything wrong with this logic.

            It’s obvious to me Fed was tiring in the match with all the running, it’s not about how many matches he played before this, it’s about the amount of energy he had to spend in the match itself. If let’s say Berdy was able to stretch Fed to go the distance, chances of a Berdy win would go higher even though he still might not win in the end. I would say the same for Cilic vs Fed in the final, it’s for Fed’s best interest that if he could, to win it in straight sets.

  15. Fed does not look inspired. he lost to Tsonga from two sets to love, I think back in 2011. the same could still possibly happen.

    • Given Fed’s TB record, don’t expect Berdy of all people to win one against Fed! If Berdy wants to win a set, he has to break Fed’s serve and hold on to his own until the end of the set, possible but hard to do.

  16. When Berdy needs his serve, he can’t produce a good one!

    Berdy’s eyes and reflexes are just too slow; how many times he’s hitting to the direction where Fed is heading to, when it’s obvious where Fed is moving!

    I think Cilic will do better than Berdy, in the final. I just hope Berdy stretches Fed here, at least gets a set for all the efforts he is putting in.

  17. Fed up two sets to love even though he’s served quite a few double faults today, more than usual at least. For anyone hoping Berdych comes back, don’t get your hopes up lol

  18. Berdy is not giving up and hold his games easily for most of the latest part. chance is very small but it is there for him to make it.

  19. The only hope that Berdych has now is to serve big and great, to hold serve easily, and tries to break Fed’s serves, hoping for Fed to start serving poorly or DF. If the match stretches longer and longer, maybe Berdy can hope that Fed gets tired physically.

  20. Fed is really not playing well at the moment but Berdy just can’t capitalize! I hope Berdy doesn’t lose heart but keeps fighting. Fed’s level has gone down now, Berdy please find a second wind and takes advantage!

    • Haha Fed hasn’t dropped a set this tournament but will be tired from a slightly tougher straight set win over Berdych while Cilic is ready to beat Federer in the Wimbledon final after dropping three sets in his last two matches. I thought us Fed fans were supposed to be delusional.

      • Yeah, but Fed’s an old man, bound to be tired from all that winning, right? Btw I’ve never thought of Cilic as a mental giant either. He won the USO against an exhausted Nishikori. If he beats Fed in the Wimbly final I’ll consider revising my opinion.

          • Just because you think you are right doesn’t make you right…

            Right Lucky? This is really childish behaviour.

          • Mark, you’re the childish one here! I mean, why for nothing you mentioned me to Benny and talked about me being delusional? Do you know how rude you are?? And I called that childish and rude!

        • Mark, please explain why Fed was serving poorly and DF six times at least during the match, since you’re so clever and not comes up with some delusional theories!

          • Maybe he was a bit tight because he’s the obvious favorite for the title now? Anyways the real question is can you explain how Fed won in straight sets playing at that lower level than usual? Because he is just that confident. I highly doubt Fed will be tired from winning every set he’s played heading into the final. But if he is I’m pretty sure his confidence will outweigh what would be a minimal amount of fatigue. Oh yeah and how would he be tired playing on a surface where quicker matches occur and he hasn’t dropped a set when he played three five setters at the AO and won it. Fatigue didn’t seem to affect him too much in that final.

          • Benny, why would Fed be feeling tight because he’s the favorite to win the title?? He’s a seven times title holder! Don’t you think it has something to do with how Berdy played?

            Berdy was serving bombs and hitting big and Fed was made to run so much, and he had quite a few mishits when on the run. Fed even looked agitated at some points during the match. Even in the first set TB, Fed made some uncharacteristic errors when he was leading to allow Berdy to level it at 4-4 or something, but Berdy dumped the next point into the net and two points later, Berdy lost the first set in the TB.

            I said in one of my earlier post, Berdych had to serve big and hit hard from the baseline to keep Fed behind the baseline, to have a slim chance against Fed. When Berdy was able to do so, moving Fed from left to right and vice versa, he had some successes vs Fed, but Berdy couldn’t sustain that for long as he’s not good enough to do so.

            The reason I said Fed might be tiring in the match was because of the running he had to do along the baseline, side to side. Berdy was the only one so far among Fed’s opponents having the firepower to do that to Fed; Raonic wasn’t able to do that because Raonic was playing a net rushing game, playing into the hands of Fed.

            Fed was forced to come up with some good serving to save BPs, his ground strokes at the later stages in the match wasn’t able to counter those of Berdy’s, perhaps Fed DF so often was because he’s aware of and wary of Berdy’s big ground strokes and that put pressure on Fed’s serves.

            I certainly don’t think I’m giving some delusional logic here.

          • I meant to explain the double faults. I know Berdych played well. I just don’t think you get that Fed played three five setters en route to Melbourne title and looked energized in that final. He’s played so much less than he did on his way to Melbourne final and should be way more energized here than he was there which was still a very high level. Bottom line is Fed hasn’t dropped a set and therefore fatigue shouldn’t be factor. It’s literally as simple as that. You’re overanalyzing the whole running too much thing. I don’t think running around a bit more than he has been because of Berdych’s power in a straight sets win will make him exhausted.

          • Benny, as I’ve mentioned, I’m not saying Fed will come out flat for the final! All I’m saying is, when the final match is stretched and has to go the distance, the physical fatigue factor may come into play. Do factor in the player’s age, if age is not a factor, then why Fed didnt want to play at the FO and the clay masters? He’s conserving as much energy as possible for this Wimbledon.

            Now there’s no point discussing it now, the final may end up being a straight sets affair and all these fatigue talks will be just moot points.

      • Benny, Fed is an old man now, didn’t you see that he was tiring in the match? I bet that if Berdcy were to win a set and the match was still going on, Fed would be making even more errors and tiring further.

        You can’t compare Fed at 35 to Cilic at 28.

        • If Fed loses the final that surely won’t be because he was tired from his semifinal match. I think its a good workout for the final as he hasn’t really been tested prior to this match.

          Fed was playing a tough opponent who was playing well…so it was not a easy match for Fed. Why should people expect a semifinal match at Wimbledon to be easy for any opponent? At least I don’t.

          • Well I don’t either, it’s only some arrogant Fed worshippers who think that it’s a walk in the park for Fed. Fed got to fight so hard, ran so much in order to get the straight sets win; it could be a four sets match if only Berdy didn’t hit some dumb shots into the net in the first set TB.

          • Benny, I’m talking about the physical fitness, not the game! Don’t be like your buddy Mark, who’s delusional and yet calling others so! I wonder how old is Mark, he’s been behaving childishly and rude!

          • Just messing around lucky lol. I know what you meant. Just look at AO when he won three five setters on his way to the whole title. How do you expect him to be less fresh than he was then because he seemed pretty energized in that final.

    • Benny, he was fresh as he’s just back from a six months break. You also forget that his opponent in the final also played two five sets matches prior to the final, and one of which was a long 5 hours match before the final with one less day of rest.

      You have to factor in one thing, as one gets older, one needs a longer recovery time after playing a match. At the AO he was fortunate that he had two days for recovery from his five sets SF match.

      I’m not saying that Fed will be too tired for this coming final, but what if he’s stretched in the final to five long sets? If that happens certainly physical fatigue may come into play.

      • He took the whole clay court season off!! That’s a break too. You’re just looking for reasons that Fed will be fatigued it’s so obvious.

        • Benny, what good does it make to me for insisting that Fed will be fatigued when he’s not? Please don’t think that we are like children, for wanting to win an argument for the sake of winning!

          What we are discussing here, whether we win the argument or not, it won’t change the outcome of the match. We are just speculating about the possibility of this or that happening. I may be right or I may be wrong, it doesn’t matter, as it’s the players who decide the outcome of the match by how they play.

          We are discussing and speculating for the fun of it, of course there is joy in analyzing and forming some opinions and if the outcome turns out to be what we expected, then we feel good about it. If we are wrong, then pick up some tips on where we go wrong and then try again next time.

          For those who bet, of course they have even more joy if what they bet for turn up to be correct and they’re rewarded in monetary terms. I’m not a betting person though.

          • Yeah true I agree. Good luck to both in the finals. To make it clear I am not annoyed that you are rooting for Cilic or anything. I like the big guy and respect people rooting for the upset. Hopefully we get an enjoyable final.

          • To be clear, I’m not rooting for the upset but I’m rooting for Cilic because he’s my second fave player.

          • I know. I respect that. That’s how I felt in the Muller Nadal match. To make it clear, I know Cilic is a boss and in my opinion his game is exciting to watch. Many think he is a boring player because he just destroys the ball but I like his strokes. Plus his energy is awsome. I love his reactions to match wins lol.

  21. Berdy is really a mental midget, couldn’t break serve and got his own serve broken! Fed wasn’t even serving all that well, yet he couldn’t take advantage!

    All the efforts and yet nothing to show for that! He’s doomed not to have a slam title in his career!

  22. even Fed not playing well to his standard, reaching slam final with most likely not losing a set is rally impressive at his age.

  23. Well. every player has his strength and weakness. some of the thing in life, you just cannot train yourself to reach the peak however hard you try. Fed has his natural born talent in someway. that’s God gift. Let’s not be hard on Berdy.

    • Well not only Fed, but the big four all have their natural talents. But, all Berdy needed in that service game of his, was to serve well to hold serve. He’s just not clutch enough to save himself out of troubles. I mean how many first serves he made in that service game? When, in his other earlier service games, he did hit some consecutive good serves to hold. If that’s not something mental, then what? He’s losing belief I feel after not breaking Fed’s serve in the previous game.

  24. Like I said in one of my earlier posts, what Berdych lacks is court craft; despite playing for so long now in the tour, he’s still not a very intelligent player and still playing a limited game.

    Compared to the younger Cilic and Delpo, they are certainly smarter and better players than Berdy, at least they learn fast and play a more all round game.

    • I thought this is the best I have seen Berdych play in some time. Fed was just too good. Fed did not have an easy draw. He just looked confident from his run so far in the year.

      • True, Berdych played really well, Fed is just on another level right now, similar to 2006/2007.

        Let’s see what Cilic can bring to the table.

      • Yeah, the best from Berdy for quite a while, despite his limited game. To me, Berdy making trips to the net was suicidal, might as well stay at the baseline to trade rally shots with Fed and won points with his big serves.

    • He’s too passive and his the ball too flat. Del Potro hits it flat but has more variety, is stronger mentally and is willing to grind it out from the baseline similar to Djokovic.

      Berdych is a great ball stroker but that doesn’t translate into wins against the world’s best.

        • Disagree. Todaay he came to net. Tried changing a few things. Berdych has the second best Wimbledon so far in terms of level ahead of Cilic.

          • Huh? Berdy coming to the net exposed his shortcomings at the net! He got passed easily by Fed, and hitting some volleys into the net. His game is limited because he doesn’t have good hands or deft touches.

          • You’re right, Lucky. Now that I think about it, I’ve never really thought of Berdych as having any net game at all… It’s too bad because he would be so much better with some net game.

  25. Congrats Benny! As far as time spent on court, straight sets was just what the doctor ordered. Considering what we all know Berdych is capable of on grass against Fed, he did a great job of making sure he wasn’t grinding for 5 sets… Cilic will obviously be a very difficult task if he is at his best. They will both obviously be gunning for that title, as neither of them is young. Even though Fed was hampered last year, he will be fully aware of how close Cilic was to beating him in that match. I expect Fed to be prepared. You never know what you will get with Cilic. He could come out firing and just completely take the racquet out of Fed’s hands. He could also be a bit nervous as he’s been dreaming of this moment his whole life. I think we could be in for a 5 set epic… But who knows, really?

  26. I expect a good final match. But, I still prefer a Fed vs Novak or Rafa match at Wimbledon. Those matches are so much more exciting. I was feeling a sense of void somewhere when I was watching the semis and having a similar feeling about the final.
    But, it is what it is.
    Anyways, I wish good luck to both Cilic and Fed for the final.

    Hope to see a good match.

    • True, I cant imagine this final becoming special or classic because of Cilic. Only Federer is making history in this match.
      This new louder Cilic will scream and pump, but we will not feel tense watching this.

  27. It’s a real anti-climax – both ATP and WTA finals — to me.

    But that’s how it goes. Have to congratulate Benny and fedfans here. Not that he’s won quite yet – but at his age getting to another final — I keep underestimating him and he keeps making GS finals. Venus too — completely didn’t pick her to win.

    That said, now ? I can’t help but think Cilic will win his first Wimbledon and Johanna Konta will win her first GS!

    • oops, what was I thinking? Konta lost to Venus! It’s Venus vs Mugu — that might be good but I won’t be able to watch tomorrow. I did notice that Kpuppy picked Venus so wow – good picking. However I hope Garbine can get her first Wimbledon.

  28. its definitely relatively anti-climactic on the men’s side, given that Fed vs. Cilic is what many people thought the final would be. As for the women’s side, I don’t Venus got too many tips to potentially win the whole thing on the women’s side, so that’s a cool story. I personally really want Venus to win. I know she can! Don’t know if she will, though…

    • At the sake of sounding like callous and unsentimental person, I’m tired of Fed and Williams sisters winning. I’ve had my decades of marveling at them and it’s not that I dislike them but I’m always hoping for new winners. There’s been a real monopoly in tennis.

      I’m tired of Froome and Sky monopolizing Tour de France, too but in cycling that happens sometimes, (the team with the biggest budget can buy, pay well and keep the best riders – US Postal comes to mind). Unbelievable Sky train has a deep pool of talent — especially in the mountains.

      • I understand. One of the Big 4 has won Wimbledon for the last *fourteen* years on the men’s side. Incredible. But the Williams sisters have not been nearly as dominant. Granted they’ve accounted for a good many between them but Venus hasn’t won Wimbly – or any slam – since 2008. Let’s give her a break, ok?

  29. If Fed wins this, he would be in very strong position to end the year at number 1 in the world unless he chooses to pull out in most of the rest of the season after USO to keep his body fit for next year slam haul.

    what was Agassi age when he reach number 1? 34?

  30. Well, at least Fed was somewhat tested by Berdych. I hope that Team Cilic will analyse the match thoroughly. Cilic has more tools than Berdych, is in good shape and has beaten Fed in a slam before. He almost beat him last year in the quarterfinal. While I think it’s more likely that Fed will win because of his vast experience Cilic certainly has the potential for an upset.
    Go Marin, and emulate Goran, your former coach. Don’t get nervous when you fall behind. You are a good deal younger and you came from behind against Müller and Querrey. If you manage to get a foot into the door and grab a set you have a chance. And don’t send your mother on errands again 😉

  31. I can’t see any which way fed will lose the final. He is high on confidence and knows the stars have aligned. No 19 for sure. Question is will be drop a set or not.

  32. Federer clearly not at his best in the semi. He was for the first few games, but that service game that he lost at 4-3 came a bit out of nowhere. Two double faults, and almost no first serves hit in, after totally dominating for his first few service games. I don’t know what that was. Tightness/nervousness most likely; possibly some fatigue, exacerbated by his cold.

    What I think happened after that is it gave Berdych some hope, and he really started going for his shots. He gave Fed a good match, and definitely had his chance in that 1st set tie-break, missing an easy FH into the net. Still, the bottom line is that Fed, playing clearly less than his best, won in straights against a very good player playing near his best.

    My take on the final: If Federer serves near his best, as he has for most of the tournament, he will win going away, possibly in straights. He has the better ROS, and the more consistent and varied game, with plenty of weapons. However, if Roger serves less well, like he like he did against Berdy, AND Cilic serves at his best, then it will be a close match, though I still give Fed the edge. For Cilic to win, three things have to happen. He has to serve lights out, hit winners like he did at USO ’14, and Roger has to serve less than his best. Federer in 4.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




Skip to toolbar