Novak Djokovic will surge into the second to last Masters 1000 event of the season just like he does pretty much every year—fresh off a title in Beijing. Djokovic cruised past Rafael Nadal in the 500-point final on Sunday for his sixth Beijing triumph in as many tries. Now both players head to Shanghai along with Tokyo champion Stan Wawrinka. This week also features the return of Roger Federer, who has played only two Davis Cup matches since the U.S. Open.
Shanghai Rolex Masters
Where: Shanghai, China
Surface: Hard
Prize money: $4,783,320
Points: 1000
Top seed: Novak Djokovic
Defending champion: Roger Federer
Draw analysis: Federer appears to have a favorable draw on his hands as he returns to tournament action for the first time since losing the U.S. Open final to Djokovic. Well, it looks good at least until the semifinals—where he could face Nadal. The 34-year-old Swiss awaits either Sam Querrey or Albert Ramos-Vinolas and his nearest seed is a weary-looking Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. Potential quarterfinal opponents for Federer are Kei Nishikori, Kevin Anderson, and Nick Kyrgios.
Nadal is on a collision course with Federer in the bottom half of the bracket. Getting that far would be an impressive result, though, as the eighth-ranked Spaniard is coming off a long week in Beijing and dealt with an apparent right-foot problem against Djokovic. Nadal may be up against dangerous big hitters early and often this week. He will kick off his campaign against the Jeremy Chardy vs. Ivo Karlovic winner. Wawrinka, Milos Raonic, and Marin Cilic also find themselves in this section.
At the moment it seems like no one other than Federer or maybe Wawrinka can even remotely trouble Djokovic, so the top-seeded Serb should coast through a quarter that is also home to David Ferrer, Feliciano Lopez, and Richard Gasquet. Ferrer has a tough draw on his hands with Bernard Tomic right off the bat likely followed by Richard Gasquet or Vasek Pospisil. Djokovic will be untested until at least the last eight unless Dominic Thiem catches fire in round three.
The weakest portion of the draw is undoubtedly the one occupied by seeds Tomas Berdych and Gilles Simon. Berdych vultured a recent 250-point title in Shenzhen but has otherwise slumped of late, while Simon got handled in routine fashion by Gilles Muller in the Tokyo quarterfinals. Jack Sock may be able to take advantage and potentially face Murray in the last eight. Murray will run into danger in the third round in the form of either John Isner or David Goffin.
First-round upset alerts: Gilles Muller over (11) Richard Gasquet. Muller is a decent 2-3 lifetime at the ATP level against Gasquet. The two veterans most recently faced each other this summer in Washington, D.C., where Gasquet survived 5-7, 6-4, 6-4. With both players in fine form (Muller is coming off a semifinal showing in Tokyo), an upset would not come as a huge shock.
(WC) Tommy Haas over (12) Kevin Anderson. There is a possibility that Anderson is content with his best-ever Grand Slam finish (a quarterfinal at the U.S. Open) and will stumble down the home stretch this fall. The South African did not play again until Tokyo, where he got destroyed by Muller in the first round. Haas has not taken the court since a five-set loss to Verdasco in New York and he has not won an ATP-level match since Wimbledon. For the oft-injured 37-year-old, however, some rest may have served him well.
Tommy Robredo over (16) Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. No result could be considered a surprise, as both players are proverbial wild cards on the heels of disastrous results this past week in Beijing. Robredo won the opening set of his first-rounder against John Millman then got blown out 6-1, 6-0. Tsonga struggled physically in a straight-set loss to Andreas Haider-Maurer. Amazingly, this is just the second-ever encounter between the two veterans. They have not gone head-to-head since the 2008 U.S. Open, where Robredo won in straight sets.
Hot: Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Stan Wawrinka, David Ferrer, Richard Gasquet, John Isner, Marin Cilic, Feliciano Lopez, David Goffin, Jeremy Chardy, Gilles Muller, Donald Young
Cold: Milos Raonic, Fernando Verdasco, Adrian Mannarino, Tommy Haas, Victor Estrella Burgos
Quarterfinal predictions: Novak Djokovic over David Ferrer, Andy Murray over Jack Sock, Marin Cilic over Rafael Nadal, and Roger Federer over Kei Nishikori
Semifinals: Djokovic over Murray and Federer over Cilic
Final: Djokovic over Federer
[polldaddy poll=9121521]
[polldaddy poll=9121724]
[polldaddy poll=9121726]
These are my predictions:
QF-
Djokovic over Ferrer
Murray over Simon
Wawrinka over Raonic
Federer over Anderson
SF-
Djokovic over Murray
Federer over Wawrinka
Final-
Federer over Djokovic
Probably some bias involved in the final pick but I do feel confident in roger that he will be able to do what he did last year against Novak in Shanghai.
I agree that Fed and Stan could be the only ones to trouble Novak. I think Rafa’s got a tough draw, especially a potential meeting with Karlovic in the early going. Then there’s Stan and Cilic. I don’t know about Raonic these days. I would like to see Rafa do well here, but there is the question mark of his foot and some tough opponents. One match at a time.
Novak has a really good draw. I can’t see anyone stopping him.
For a change Either Murray or Federer for the title.
Surprisingly you have listed Stan as hot, but you are not backing him to even reach the QF, is it because he is playing back to back events, or he is just too unpredictable?
he was supposed to be in there
Stan is 12-1 in his last 13 matches. I meant to add him to hot but was waiting on tokyo result then forgot.
Reblogged this on Tennis Abides.
Rafa will play Dr Ivo in the 2nd round. Karlo beat Chardy 64 76.
Vamos Rafa!
Tignor, like myself, is picking Roger to defend his title over Novak in the final.
He is being rather harsh on Nadal in my opinion. Former rival? Wow is all I can say…
“Was Rafael Nadal’s runner-up finish at a 500 event in Beijing a success or a sign of continued struggle? On the one hand, he reached the final and got a measure of revenge on his surprising new nemesis, Fabio Fognini. On the other hand, he lost in ultra-routine fashion, 6-2, 6-2, to his former rival Djokovic in the final—the most troubling aspect may be that Nadal didn’t even play that badly, and still came away with just four games. We’ll find out more about Rafa’s form this week. One thing you can say about his draw, it doesn’t look like fun: Nadal starts against Ivo Karlovic, and could play Milos Raonic after that.”
http://www.tennis.com/pro-game/2015/10/week-preview-shanghai/56565/#.VhweZ7xqrZZ
Rafa and his Uncle clearly indicated prior to the match that Rafa knows “this year Novak, is a different league of my one”…the Serbian press published it all over the place…so whoever expected that Rafa would push hard in this match was wrong…Rafa played well but did not give it his all IMO…why would he? Novak owns Beijing anyway…
Still Novak’s team was very tense.
Christophe Umlaut (@Chris_Umlaut) ALIAS hawkeye63 says:
October 12, 2015 at 9:07 pm
—Tignor, like myself, is picking Roger to defend his title over Novak in the final—
===
.
Money’s gone.
nats, he was sweating buckets towards the end of the first set.
Nah, Rafa did push hard in the first set but came out short because his shots were lacking precision. Novak’s OTOH barely touched the lines and the fact that Novak had to hit his shots to barely touched the lines was an indication that Rafa had pushed him to take more risk in order to win the point(s).
In the second set, Rafa’s intensity dropped and he didnt make any changes to his game plan after losing the first set; and Novak after winning the first set, had gained more confidence and calm and so was playing better.
I think Novak could still up his gear when necessary whilst Rafa would have to make changes to his game plan to stay with Novak. Novak usually beat Rafa in straight sets in BO3 HC matches even in Rafa’s good years of 2008 and 2013 so Rafa losing to a top form Novak 6-2, 6-2 wasnt anything shocking imo. The most important thing is that Rafa can overcome his nervousness and regain some confidence in his game.
Imagine a few of Rafa’s narrowly out shots landing in and the score line may be more respectable even if hes not winning the match.
^^^ Truth.
Ramos serves for the match against Roger at 5:3
Ramos has MP
OMG isn’t tennis unpredictable or what? Fed is gone…
The best reality TV.
NFL is close
I meant sports in general.
Ramos beats Roger in 3 sets. 76 26 63
Vamos Albert!!!
Let’s see if there will be any Roger trash talking.
nadline10 ( at 12:20 pm),
…and making an unforgettable hero out of Albert Ramos-Vinolas (in sports/tennis media).
Roger served 15 aces and still lost. Ramos served 6 aces.
not surprising
losing after hitting 30 aces if your opponent hits 0 may be surprising (but not shocking). 15-6 is nothing.
Vamos!
(Roger hit uncharacteristically short with a lot of UEs which made commies say Ramos played the match of his life. Hillarious!)
I must agree…Roger engaged in those long rallies with Ramos which is not his favorite style of play…I immediately thought Roger would be in trouble…he was certainly not playing well and Ramos to my surprise did not choke…this is what Rafa’s slump this year does to the lower ranked players…they all start believing and continue fighting against top players…
A lot of it was Roger’s being rusty with just two Davis Cup matches since the US Open.
The same scheduling almost cost him in Shanghai last year when he saved five match points in the first round vs Mayer before going on to win the tournament.
Big loss of 1000 points for the 2nd best player of all time.
Best* of all time
Not according to many tennis greats past and present.
Vamos Ramos!
VA-mos RA-mos
clap-clap
clap-clap-clap
? NOOO ROGER!! ? Big win for Ramos though. It will be interesting to see how the opening up of the draw affects the tournament. Too bad for Andy that he is on Novaks side because he would be through to finals most likely but he will probably lose in semis to Novak. Hoping someone upsets at least one of them on the way though so we can have some deep runs from underdogs like last year when Simon and Lopez played in one of the semis.
This loss could really be a blow to his chances at keeping world number 2 and keeping that seeding for Melbourne and even Paris masters and year end finals.
Fed was No. 3 before he played this morning. Andy already had past him when the rankings came out today.
Fed is No.2
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRM5DzhU8AAGN_W.png
Wrong.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/rankings/singles
In live rankings Roger is number 2 by thirty points so Andy just has to win first match and he will pass Roger. If Andy somehow loses his first match then Roger will be number 2 again but yes in the not live rankings that were posted Monday on atp website Murray is ranked 2.
this is correct
Rankings come out every Monday. Murray doesn’t drop his Vienna points until Oct. 19th. He currently has 8640 points to Roger’s 8420.
Murray is the No. 2 player in the world today. Roger is No. 3.
Trust the ATP site next time, not some fan spreadsheet.
#HopeThisHelps
The ATP site shows rankings on Monday (yesterday). I posted Live rankings (today, on Tuesday, at 13:35 GMT).
Read carefully next time!
Benny G (at 1:54 pm),
You are correct! 🙂
[polldaddy poll=9124768]
Your source is wrong as I’ve explained. Today Murray is No. 2 not Federer.
If Murray was entered in a tournament next week, he’d be seeded 2 in the draw and Federer seeded 3rd.
Even the live calculation is incorrect as Murray’s points from Vienna don’t drop until next week.
[edited for unnecessary insult]
[deleted for unnecessary insult]
Even if it was “live”, neither Fed nor Murray have lost or gained any points since yesterday, so how would the “live” ranking change exactly?
Ricky Dimon says:
October 13, 2015 at 3:33 pm
this is correct
This is incorrect.
Murray is presently No. 2 (i.e., live today, not future next week.)
Doesn’t matter guys it’s just rankings.
it doesn’t matter because Fed and Murray are not playing in the same tournament again until Paris…and then the World Tour Finals. So it doesn’t matter until we get closer to those.
It matters because it’s funny.
Some people think that something is correct just by saying it is.
If that was the case, the world would be flat like a pancake.
You sure post a lot about something that doesn’t matter lol.
who cares my asterisk.
October 13, 2015 at 2:31 pm,
A lot of people know how the ATP men’s tennis rankings work, Benny G among them.
No points have changed since the rankings came out yesterday and even if/when they do, Murray would be seeded ahead of Feder heading into any tournament next week.
October 13, 2015 at 3:13 pm,
Oh, the first sentence of hawkeye63 at 3:13 pm got deleted…
October 13, 2015 at 4:29 pm,
Just like the first sentence of augusta08 at 4:29 pm got deleted…
October 13, 2015 at 4:33 pm,
Nope! My full text (at 4:29 pm) is available.
October 13, 2015 at 5:05 pm
Nope! My full text (at 3:13 pm) is available.
ICYMI Murray is still No. 2 in the world today. The world we “live” in.
Nothing new.
October 13, 2015 at 5:13 pm,
Nope, your full text (posted at 3:13 pm) is available in WordPress’s notification…
No.
October 13, 2015 at 5:49 pm,
Nope, your full text (posted at 4:29 pm) is available in WordPress’s notification…
zzzzzz…
https://twitter.com/CJSTanner/status/653923637800603648/photo/1
I love her already… 🙂
Love it. 🙂
Look at the link http://live-tennis.eu it is real live rankings. Not a fan spreadsheet.
Who runs the site?
Always question the source.
Basically if Murray loses his first match here he is down to number three and stays at number 2 if he wins his first match.
Not until next Monday.
Regardless of what happens in Shanghai, Murray would be seeded in a draw ahead of Federer in any tournament both played in next week.
who cares
Yeah I know. And I’ve used that site in past and it is always accurate for next weeks rankings but eh doesn’t matter like Ricky said. Either way djokovic is number one by a billion points lol.
live-tennis.eu is never wrong
it’s only problem is on Sundays when it does not do a good job of indicating which week it is representing
Federer will be No. 2 next week only if Murray loses to Steve Johnson
It’s only wrong in that Murray is No. 2, not Federer.
Yep exactly. ALLEZ STEVIE J!!
Fed looked out of sorts played a terrible match and got trounced by a nobody, really an embarrassing defeat for Fed.
He was rusty. Almost happened 1st round last year when he saved 5 match points.
Can happen to anyone.
@ lucky,
I agree with what you said about Rafa pushing Novak in the first set and it would have been totally wrong to even think that Rafa tanked the match….it’s nothing like that…but what I am saying is that it was not Rafa pushing as hard as he could…he still has one more gear to go and he will prove it next time he meets Novak…that is my honest opinion…I think Beijing final is not important…if they are to meet in Shanghai final the situation will be much different…
I definitely agree that if some of Rafa’s shots landed on the line it could have gone better way for Rafa even though he would have lost anyway…the thing is that Rafa does not consider himself ready to deal with this Novak and he rightly thinks so…but Novak and his team realized that this Rafa is an improved version…I even go that far to think that Novak mentioned Rafa’s potential injury in his ceremony speech to play yet another mind game with Rafa and his team…Novak knows Rafa is nearing his best and he already feels uncomfortable about it…and he should…
you are saying Rafa wasn’t giving 100 percent?
I’m not sure that’s ever happened.
French Open vs Novak 3rd set.
Little wonder Rafa and his team were panicked when he rolled his right ankle – I posted a link on the Rafa thread article that goes into the foot problem in depth and U.Toni’s MO for the remainder of the year. This must have prayed on his mind for the the remainder of the final. Indeed, Ricky commented in his view his level dropped by 10% after the MTO.
NNY: In the article U.Toni confirmed Rafa is working on restructuring his game and hinted not to expect a change in his level until next year.
I easily would have picked Fed to be in the Finals….until this morning’s match….so forget that idea. Joker to win it all….and Sock to go far!
Murray beat Novak in Montreal and no reason he can’t do it again in the semis in Beijing.