Shanghai final preview and pick: Djokovic vs. Tsonga

Novak Djokovic is one win away from going through the Asian swing undefeated. Standing in his way of both that feat and the Shanghai title on Sunday is Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. Djokovic crushed Andy Murray in the semis, while Tsonga outlasted Rafael Nadal.

Novak Djokovic and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga will be squaring off for the 20th time in their careers when they collide in the final of the Shanghai Rolex Masters on Sunday.

Djokovic leads the head-to-head series 13-6, but Tsonga is 6-7 lifetime against the Serb on hard courts and 6-6 in hard-court matches that did not end in retirement. While all of those numbers are encouraging for the underdog, this one is not: Djokovic has won 11 of the last 12 at Tsonga’s expense after once trailing the series 5-2. Tsonga finally ended an 11-match losing skid by rolling over Djokovic–and everyone else–6-2, 6-2 en route to the Rogers Cup title last summer.

Shanghai, though, is not exactly the spot where the Frenchman would choose to face Djokovic. The world No. 1 is 23-3 lifetime at this event following victories this week over Martin Klizan, Feliciano Lopez, Bernard Tomic, and Andy Murray and only Tomic has been remotely competitive. Djokovic is also 16-0 in his last 16 matches with titles at the U.S. Open and in Beijing.

Tsonga is invoking memories of his run to the 2014 Toronto title. The competition has not been as strong, but the mental fortitude it has required is commendable. The 15th-ranked Frenchman, a quarterfinalist at the U.S. Open and champion in Metz, survived consecutive three-set thrillers against Albert Ramos-Vinolas, Kevin Anderson, and Rafael Nadal. He preceded those victories by taking out Tommy Robredo and Victor Estrella Burgos.

“All along the season I worked hard to be able to play these matches,” Tsonga commented. “When it happens, I’m really happy to have worked hard because I know I can count on my body. It’s something great for me because it was not always like this. Today I’m a lot stronger than I was maybe few years ago. I think it’s good for me.

“I feel good. To be honest, the season was difficult with a lot of ups and downs. This surface is one of my favourites. I know I’m able to play good tennis. Before I came here, I didn’t know if I will be able to play that good. I hope it’s going to continue.”

It may continue later this fall, but not on Sunday. Tsonga’s Toronto upset of Djokovic was an obvious aberration as opposed to the rule. Speaking of ruling, that is just what the top seed has been doing in Asia and there is no reason to think he is descending from the throne anytime soon.

Pick: Djokovic in 2 losing 5-7 games

[polldaddy poll=9131953]

214 Comments on Shanghai final preview and pick: Djokovic vs. Tsonga

  1. Haha the poll. I’m hoping Tsonga wins but that just seems not likely at all. I say Nole in 5-7 games but it could be like 2-4 to be honest. A win for Tsonga would be amazing. I’m rooting for Jo but Novak should be too locked in to be honest.

  2. Who are the people who voted for Tsonga to win? Twelve people voted for Tsonga to win. Are they kidding?

    It would be a shocker if Novak does not prevail. I believe I voted for 5-7 games.

  3. Ricky, what is the maximum points that a player can accumulate over one year. If djoko wins this he must have just dropped 1600 points ,800 at french and 800 at the two summer masters over the past one year, no?

  4. Nah, he also lost at QF at Doha so he got 45 instead of 250 points. To me, the greatest beneficiary of Rafa’s slump is Novak, who has no problem now at the USO where he only managed one title in the past despite reaching five finals. Fed is done winning slams as long as Rafa or Novak is still around waiting to meet him. Fed has lost all three recent slam finals to Novak.

    Its now left with Stan who still can really beat Novak at the slams, if Rafa can’t get back to his old winning ways.

    I vote for Novak to win this one losing 5-7 games, maybe only 4 games.

  5. Everyone discounting tsonga too much I feel, Tsonga has been serving really well and been quite solid at the baseline. I feel Novak will still win but it won’t be as routine as everyone thinks, novak in 3 for me.

  6. Agree. His brawn without his brains doesn’t cut it with the likes of Djokovic. I’m still cross with Rafa for not getting a grip on the first set yesterday 🙁 As a final this is a damp squid.

      • I am sure five years back, Djoko used to feel that opponents roll over for Rafa and fight tooth and nail against him. You can only play as well as your opponent lets you

      • yup…. how is it even possible realistically that players ALWAYS bring out their best against rafa and not against nole or federer?! lol

        Thing is, it is about styles of play. Rafa is allowing players to play the way they want to…. if rafa is playing at his peak powers, he can also prevent a lot of players from playing their best…

  7. It may be a blessing in disguise for Rafa come to think of it. Tsonga is ‘suffering’ out there now. I hope for Rafa to meet Novak only when Rafa is ready for it, not when Novak clearly has the upperhand and would boost his (Novak’s) confidence and add to his legacy even more when he adds another win over Rafa to his own records.

    Actually Rafa played well yesterday, just that he didnt change up and insisted on hitting his I/O CCFH when Tsonga was waiting there for it. He should have moved his feet and hit an I/I FHDTL. Im sure Tsonga then would have to rush to cover his BH corner, giving Rafa enough time to move to the net to intercept any return from Tsonga. Rafa in the past would do that with success, maybe hes still not confident to change things up just yet esp at crucial moments.

    Back to the final, I hope Tsonga can win a set at least, now that he’s holding serve a bit better.

    • I seem to recall that Roland Garros remained resolutely unconquered, and the Olympics, not forgetting Cincinnati. But perhaps it is only a matter of time.

      By improving from defeated semi-finalist to irresistible champion, Djoker benefits the most from Fed’s opening-match defeat this week, with Nadal some way behind and Murray after that. True, Tsonga got more than the latter two but he’s not really in the discussion generally.

      Very good week for Nadal, with a Top-4 win at last (in commanding fashion against Wawrinka, reversing their last two results) revenge against regular Top-10 player Raonic and a solid challenge against ex-stalwart Tsonga. A solid spell in Asia may yet bear fruit back in Europe. His immediate challenge is to try to win an indoor title before his 20s are up. In common with everyone else, he may need to avoid Djoker if this is to happen.

  8. Novak wins 5 M1000 twice..Hope someone stops him at Paris so that he does not win 6 and holds that record jointly with Rafa.

    He is at 25 Masters..very close to Rafas 27 and 95% will cross that.

  9. Any chance Rafa has to get back to No 4 before AO? I am very sure if he is No 5, as happened in FO & USO, he will land in Novaks qtr.

    • That is the question that I have been asking myself. There is no way I want to see Rafa in Novak’s part of the draw at the AO.

  10. The way he is playing, he deserves all the glory coming his way. He has been beating the top 10 up at every tourney he has played irrespective of the surface.

    • Weak field…Fed too old, Rafa with his nerves which are destroying his game, Andy mental case who fails on big stage, Wawa with his private life demons, young guns to slow in progress…this way Novak is nothing but outstanding…

      • Djokovic’s technique right now is really solid. And he has found some key to timing that makes him better than before; this way, if he has motivation, he can win a lot more. I personally have to rate this season higher than 2011 in terms of level of game, in 2011 Novak was more about physical prowess and unreal confidence on big points. Right now, he just a great formula for winning.

  11. I have a sinking feeling we’re heading for a repeat of the Sampras and Federer era when 90% of matches were NID unless somebody (hopefully Rafa) steps up to the plate to stop the train wreckage.

  12. @vmk
    You’re quite right he’s earned his success the hard way. It’s not that I begrudge him the glory but tennis needs competitive matches that bring in the crowds and maintain high TV viewership not endless one-way matches.

  13. Why are we assuming it will be 1 man show? Why are we assuming he will keep this up? Did he keep up his 2011 level from 2012-2014?

    Yes he is the number 1 for 4 of past 5 years and has been most consistent but he dominated only 11 & 15. 13 was a Rafa show and 2012 and 2014 was dominated by no one, it was shared glory.

  14. There is nothing fixed in tennis..Anything can happen.

    U dont need to look beyond what happened to Rafa after his stellar 2008, 2010 and 2013 seasons.

    Novak in 2011 is also a prime reference. How many of us thought after 2011..he would win only 3 of next 12 slams?

  15. Novak is blessed that he doesnt have any major injuries and peak only after Fed was past his prime or almost, and Rafa having peaked at 2010, had to deal with a serious blow of hurting himself at the AO in 2011 when going for his ‘Rafa slam’. Rafa was unfortunate to have to face Novak and lost narrowly to him at Miami final in 2011, when before IW/Miami finals that year, he had not lost a Masters final to Novak.

    Imo, Novak peaked at the right time to take advantage of a weak field when other than the big four plus Stan, there are no up and coming youngsters who are ready to challenge for the big prizes and the rest of the top ten too weak to make any impact. Not forgetting, we have Fed and then Murray, followed by Rafa whom each has/had a dreadful season (from 2013-2015) hence the weakened field during those years. We missed a Delpo too who was threatening Novak at Wimbledon and Shanghai in 2013, before Delpo injured his wrist again.

    Rafa to me had missed the boat in 2009,.when he was clearly having the upperhand over Fed at the slams and Novak and Murray were not ready to threaten him at the slams. 2009 should be the year where Rafa could dominate over all the slams and cemented his greatness there and then. I strongly feel that had Rafa managed his schedule well and skipped Rotterdam and avoided the injury there, his season would turn out different.

    Rafa is not doing badly though having missed the boat in 2009 but he and his team failec to manage his schedule well and he had to suffer so many injuries and upsets since.

    Novak is now the HC king, very good on clay and grass too so he’s poised to rule the tennis world right into the future until he grows old unless some young guns out of no where could rise and challenge him.

    • Skipping Rotterdam wouldn’t have helped Rafa. He skipped the 2009 Wimbledon due to tendonitis/tendinitis in his knees. He recovered from it thanks to PRP treatment in 2010 (April & July).
      At the 2009 US Open, Rafa had a right abdominal muscle injury (he got injured in Cincinnati and the tear was getting worse at the US Open).

      • Nope, if you remember, Rafa wasnt fully recovered from the Rotterdam injury but had to play the DC tie against Serbia not long after. When he lost to Delpo at Miami that year, he was frustrated with himself and was hitting his thigh when sitting down during interval. He was already complaining about his knee issue prior to the clay season and wouldve skipped the new Madrid clay Masters had it not being a home event. His 4 hrs Madrid SF vs Novak was the last straw, damaged his knees that he had to lose early at FO and skipped Wimbledon. To me, had he rested after his AO exploits, he might save himself from the injury; skipping Barcelona and played Madrid might also help him.

        The abdominal muscle tear might not be there in the first place had he played Wimbledon right through the NA HC swing. Its the stop start (skipping Wimbledon and restarting at the HCs) that caused him the problem.

      • Luckystar is absolutely correct, his schedule was badly managed in 2009 post the AO -which led to a series of defeats – one of the worst being RG and culminated in his exit at the WTF at the RR stage. There was an added factor which doesn’t get talked about very much i.e. the looming break up of his parents’ marriage which affected him badly and almost certainly destablised him emotionally on court for much of the year. I read that his father broke the news to him on the plane after the AO triumph.

      • totally agree with the scheduling. Rafa’s scheduling was never too good…team nole and team federer have always done that better…

        Rafa could have saved himself in 2009 to a a decent extent… and saying masters 1000 are mandatory is not an excuse at all…come on, players can always skip them…not a big issue they are…

      • ed251137 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 12:31 pm
        —There was an added factor which doesn’t get talked about very much i.e. the looming break up of his parents’ marriage …—
        ===
        .
        Every Rafan who have read Rafa’s autobiography titled “My Story” should know this. 🙂

      • October 18, 2015 at 12:34 pm
        — and saying masters 1000 are mandatory is not an excuse at all…—
        ===
        .
        It’s not an excuse; it’s the ATP rule and there are ATP penalties.

      • Augusta:

        No match, mandatory or otherwise, is compulsory when a player is injured!

        The penalties are imposed to stop players cherry picking which tournaments they play.

        Federer has managaed his schedule astutely for years. Just look at his Performance Timelne for evidence of this.

      • ed251137 (at 12:53 pm),
        Whatever, a penalty is a penalty.
        .
        I have read for more than 5 years that “Federer has managaed his schedule astutely for years…” (i.e. since I started to visit Tennistalk)…

    • I know he is not required to play mandatory Masters now but before that he was still prepared to skip or exit early when he felt it prudent to so so.

    • lucky,

      I don’t agree. I think that after Rafa’s amazing year in 2010, one would have rightly assumed that he would dominate in 2011. He had the back luck to get that terrible virus at Doha and that seemed to change everything. He lost in the quarterfinals to Ferrer due to a hamstring injury that came from Rafa not being fully recovered. I think that disappointment set the tone. I also think it took Rafa even more time to fully recover from that severe viral infection.

      Things seemed to go downhill from there and Rafa was unable to handle a Novak who was playing much better that year. But I simply cannot agree about the mismanagement of his schedule being the cause of everything.

      I think the big mistake Rafa made in 2009 was after winning the AO. He needed a few weeks rest to recover from playing two incredibly tough and long matches in the semis and finals. But he played in Rotterdam a week later. That was the decision that would ultimately cost him very dearly.

      It’s also easy to go back and say something in hindsight. No one can know the future. So I think it’s kind of a pointless exercise to say – should have, would have.

      • Just one more thing to add to my post @ 2:29 pm. I am in agreement with you about Rafa playing at Rotterdam. I also can agree that there were some mistakes and bad decisions regarding Rafa’s schedule. He and his team had to learn the hard way.

        I will also say that the decision to play in Madrid that year is really inexplicable. Rafa already had pain in his knees. That semi with Novak was a case of winning the battle but losing the war. That match was the last straw for Rafa’s knees. I will never understand why he played there and this business of it being mandatory is absurd. Rafa had knee tendinitis and that was more than sufficient as a legitimate injury to give him reason not to play.

        I am just saying that I do not agree that the mistakes in scheduling in 2009 are the entire reason why Rafa could not dominate. I say that because Rafa did come back and dominate in 2010. It was when the new improved Novak arrived in 2011. That changed everything and nothing Rafa did or did not do would have changed it.

      • nativenewyorker7 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 2:36 pm,
        —this business of it being mandatory is absurd—
        ===
        .
        You should let the ATP know that the rules are absurd.

      • NNY, I dont think you get my point right. The scheduling issues happened in 2009 which to me was the cause for Rafa’s injury issues. If not for the injury, who knows, Rafa would have another two or even three more slams under his belt and Fed two less, and Rafa might have a good three to four years of continual dominance and hence more weeks at no.1

        His 2010 schedule was OK except for playing three consecutive weeks during the Asian HC swing. What I found frustrating was that when Rafa was on the cusp of achieving something great, ie getting his Rafa slam at the AO the following year, he had to be involved in those charity matches that he had with Fed at both Swizerland and Spain, and hence wasnt able to rest and recover and be well prepared for the next season. His virus infection at Doha made things worse. His 2011 season was a misery for him, with the missed chance at the AO and the subsequent losses to Novak.

    • 1) There was never such a thing as ‘Rafa Slam’. Nothing belongs to a player until he actually wins it. Nadal didn’t. If he got injured (or claimed to have been so) yet again, the problem is his. It’s not luck. It’s his problem that he cannot vary his game enough to control damage to his body and has to periodically. In fact he’s lucky everything plays so slow. At least he was able to contend and win at all majors.
      2)Nadal wasn’t “unfortunate” to be in finals. What kind of a logic is that? I can bet he’d take his 2011 over the current season anyday.

      • And as for claimed, you mean like Roger claimed mono, his.”back”problem in 2013 and his conveniently short lived back problem that lasted a single day when he was to meet Nole in the WTF finals then yes?

      • His Rafa slam means Rafa winning and holding all four slams at the same time, not THE calendar slam which doesnt ‘belong’ to anyone. Its just like Novak was going for his ‘Novak slam’ at the FO2012 after winning Wimbledon, USO in 2011 and AO in 2012. We certainly wont call that THE calendar slam or the Federer slam, do we??

        Unfortunate to meet Novak in the final means: to have to meet the all conquering Novak in the final and not anyone less formidable there. I thought that’s pretty obviously and needs no explanation!

      • lucky,

        Oh, thanks for the clarification. I see your point now. I did say that I agreed with you basically. I do think that Rafa playing Rotterdam a week after that physical grueling AO was really unwise. He pushed himself way too hard after that. The final blow was playing in Madrid and that long, tough battle with Novak in the semifinal. It really was the last straw for Rafa’s knees.

        But now I do get that if Rafa had cut back and schedule himself more wisely in 2009, he could have managed to win RG and maybe even Wimbledon again. Instead it was Fed who reaped the benefits and he won both including the career slam.

        Thanks again! 🙂

      • Falter in terms of being or not being able to play in any era. Now THAT was obvious.
        There’s no such thing as RafaSlam/ Novak Slam and the Novak Slam until it’s done-which in both instances was not the case.
        As for being unfortunate- I don’t count 14 majors as unfortunate from any angle. That way we could all have stories of misfortune for our favourite players. If meeting the best player of the moment in finals is unfortunate then a lot of players have been really unlucky in life.

      • Agree with TennisFan here. The word “if” weighs heaviest in Luckystar’s post; all we have is the record, which shows that both Fed and Djoker came within one match (and, to be really picky, two sets) of a non-calendar slam. Nadal fell two matches short of that.

        He has some wonderful records of his own, and it beggars belief that a self-described Nadal fan would want Djoker to overtake the Fed slam titles record when this involves overhauling Nadal himself. Given that the Serb has overtaken Nadal on almost all other fronts, leaving only h2h and Masters Series titles won (bar the clay records which will surely be Nadal’s alone) – and these are surely a formality at the rate of going – it is pretty difficult to credit. Most neutrals place the greatest value on slam titles won when assessing the greats. Anybody would think the poster in question adored Federer, and none too secretly at that.

      • If course it is. A player’s skill set is a ‘credit report’ of his ability to perform in a given condition. I may not be able to predict how many majors Fed would win in precisely which quantum. But I can always judge his skill level, compare it with those who’ve played before and place him firmly in their company- which is what I’m doing. I cannot do the same for either Nadal or Djokovic on grass and Nadal on HC because I can see the aggregate limitations of their games which get masked in today’s conditions.

      • So many straw man arguments here. So hilarious!

        I am a tennis fan first and foremost before, during and after Rafa’s career.

        And Nole doesn’t have to pass Rafa first and alternately can do it after Rafa retires. I will always cheer for Rafa in a match vs. Nole and Rafa can still catch Fed. If he doesn’t, I will cheer for Nole to catch him.

        “the Serb has overtaken Nadal on almost all other fronts” except, except, except…

        So many qualifiers here
        -other than clay
        -other than Masters events
        -other than slams
        -other than winning h2h (or tie) vs every top 30 player
        -other than DC wins
        -other than Olympic Gold

        “Most neutrals place the greatest value on slam titles won when assessing the greats. ”

        This may be the funniest statement and straw man at that. Please list a few tennis “neutrals”? And besides, you don’t have to be neutral to place greatest value on slam titles. I know I do.

        I just hope that you don’t compare “greatest” with “only”, don’t you? Or do you. No, you did. OK good.

      • Hmm, you’re the one who expressed a wish for Djoker to overtake Federer in terms of slams won. It clearly means a lot to you.

      • As far as my interest in tennis, yeah, it’d be cool.

        But not sure what that has to do with your straw man posts. Likely nothing. Just a transparent diversion attempt at pointing out your straw man arguments.

      • Preferably Rafa but anyone especially a great player like Nole would be great.

        It would give the same type of satisfaction I got watching Nole beat Fed and shut up all of the boorish fed fans in Ashe that cheered every one of Nole’s unforced errors, every missed first serve, double fault and interrupted many service motions. Classless.

        That. Was. Awesome.

  16. Too much credit given to Djokovic who benefits from Rafa’s injuries…if the mental midget Berny was able to test him anyone hard hitting & serving well could do so…as one Nole’s fan said Novak is bemused with easiness in wining his matches…the opponents simply do not believe they can beat him and rather lose their matches in the locker room…Stan being exception as he never feared Novak’s “wall” game…
    I believe this endless rally game of Nole will affect his body at some point unless he and his team start better planing of his schedule and focus mainly on GS…but it’s not gonna happen…their minds are still into the wining it all pattern…when they finally realize the mistake they are making it will be too late…

    • If anyone is hoping that Novak will fall apart physically, I think that’s wishful thinking. I said yesterday that I think Novak does what is necessary to win in the earlier rounds and then goes up another gear when it really counts. That’s the formula he has now and it’s working for him. He has enormous reserves of confidence. If he doesn’t have to go all out to beat a lesser player, then he’s not going to kill himself just to make the score look better. Tomic supposedly testing him means nothing in the end, because Novak won Shanghai. He’s looking at the big picture.

      • it’s not hoping or any kind of evil-wishing to that matter…nothing like that…it’s just a logical thing…anyone into sports knows it…no one is able to endure so much stress on his body unless having some superhuman powers…and we all know Novak’s history…he used to retire all the time due to breathing problems, and other sorts of issues…

        ATM Novak is so good from the baseline and at the same time full of confidence that he can outhit anyone…however, other tennis players will start doing the same thing, the way for instance, Albert Ramos was able to outhit Fed…it is just matter of time and belief…

        Novak is aging as well and will get a bit slower every year while hitting the ball like crazy every single match will do no favor to his body…and playing every tournament will be taxing on his body…

    • augusta,

      You know exactly what I was talking about. My point is that if a player has a legitimate injury, then that gives him a reason to skip a Masters event. Rafa had the knee tendinitis and that was more than sufficient reason for him to pull out. Everyone here knows that it’s mandatory to play Masters events, but we also know that players have had to pull our due to injury. It does happen.

      • nativenewyorker7 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 2:59 pm
        augusta,
        —You know exactly what I was talking about—
        ===
        .
        Nope, I can’t see into your head.

    • TennisFan,

      I think that you are being deliberately obtuse in this discussion. Of course it can’t be something until it’s done! Everyone knows that! But I don’t get why you are carping over anyone saying that it’s the Rafa slam or the Novak slam. Rafa had the chance to go for it, so did Fed and Novak. Nobody was able to get it done. That’s a fact. So what’s the problem?

      I also think you know what was meant about Rafa having the misfortune to meet Novak
      in the finals in 2011. Rafa could beat everyone else, but had trouble with the new version of Novak that year. Nobody said he had a bad year either. Also, Rafa ultimately did find the answers and got the best of Novak for the next few years until this year.

      Where did you get the idea that Fed was made to succeed in any era? That’s hubris if I ever heard it! Since when? How can you possibly know that? Also, what’s your point? The fact is that Fed played in the era in which he played. The one immutable point that Fed fans cannot deal with, is the lopsided H2H that Rafa has over Fed. If you trash or demean Rafa, then you are just doing the same to your guy. If Rafa is not all that, then how was he able to be so dominant and win so many times against Fed? Surely you are not going to say it’s luck.

      If you are going to argue that Fed was made to succeed in any era, then I can argue that Rafa certainly was made to succeed in any era. He owns Fed in their H2H. You cannot get around that fact.

      • Where did I even attempt to justify the “H2H” that you are so obsessed with? It is not a concern for me the same way that the fact that Pete did not win a FO is not a concern for me. Both have their reasons which have been adequately dealt with as far as I am concerned. Roger’s career did have its pitfalls. He did blow his share of leads/ miss an inordinate amount of break point opportunities against a lot of guys/ blow a few MPs and so forth. But I rate the aggregate of his skill set to be superior to the others that I have seen. I can see it play out in front of me and it’s actually fairly obvious to most. I think he’s far superior to anyone I have seen in this era and in most other eras and that along with what I think is the perfect built for tennis is what has ultimately helped his durability in tennis and his capacity to contend with those far removed from his own generation.

  17. This is Nole’s best season. 2011 was big because of the streak but he’s better this year. 2011 he faded badly. No sign of that this year. He is finishing strong.

  18. Djokovic in 2015 –
    Tournaments – 14
    Finals – 13
    Titles – 9
    Grand Slams – 3
    Won – 71
    Lost – 5

    And you guys think Djokovic’s success is being exaggerated or he is being given more credit than he deserves? Look at these numbers….this is insane! he is doing in day in day out and the change of surfaces is not bothering him… I am HATING this because he is catching up with rafa so quickly….he has 10 slams and he is set to overtake rafa in Masters 1000 as well…he is leading in the weeks at no.1 and the YE no.1’s …

    Yeah, the timing has been favorable for him but how much djokovic has improved in all aspects is incredible. he is a far superior player than he was in 2011! he is right now, the fittest mentally as well as physically and his game is impenetrable at times…

    I am hopeful rafa is going to be back to his best and he will wrestle away a few more slams… but djokovic is a very scary prospect now…look how much he has distanced himself from Murray this year!

    Rafa also said novak is on a totally different level right now… Federer has aged but he has become more dangerous than ever in many ways..true he has lost some instinct and speed but he is a much more complete player. The way fed demolished wawrinka at the USO and then the way novak halted him was quite impressive.

    Rafa is the only guy who can stop this novak. I don’t hope injurues for anyone but I guess it would be fair if novak can have some barriers ? haha…. Rafa needs to be ready 100% by the time AO rolls around! and he can do it!

    • vamosrafa,

      I agree with your take on Novak’s success this year. I also appreciate you posting the stats to back up your argument. I just managed to catch the last half of the second set of the final today. I wasn’t even planning on watching it. But I switched to the tennis channel and it was on. I have to say that Novak had all the answers. He was brilliant. As expected, Tsonga couldn’t do much.

      Novak has improved in all aspects of his game. He’s gone to a whole other level and that’s why he’s left everyone else behind. As for Fed, he can only beat Novak in a best of three match. He cannot beat him in slams anymore.

      I also agree with you that I just hate seeing this. I have to accept and acknowledge it because I don’t like in a fantasy world. But I don’t like it at all. He is getting too close to Rafa for my liking. We do need Rafa back to his best. He is the only one who can stop Novak.

  19. Things change pretty quickly in tennis…. When rafa won AO 09 people thought he would shatter all records but then he got unlucky and got injured…. people thought fed’s reign would last forever until rafa changed the order in 2008 and we know djokovic faded after 2011…BUT, it is a bit different this time in that djokovic is a better player and competition is not too great unless rafa really steps up…

    I have high hopes and expectations from rafa….he is capable of dominating again… may luck also be on his side.

  20. the only thing different in Nole’s game now is his physical fitness which allows him to win his matches on pure power and endurance…all of this leads to increase in confidence and mental strength…he is able to run and hit forever…his serve is also huge advantage but we all know that good serving depends on mental condition…

    Novak was able to challenge Rafa way back in 2011 and he used to lose matches mentally as Rafa was mental beast back then…his game was quite good even back then…he has not tremendously improved…that is IMO fake impression of having weak opponents…and the proof of it is Fed being able to challenge him even now…and Stan being able to beat him mainly because the RG is the place at which Novak has never won the title and his belief and mental toughness suddenly fade away…

    Rafa’s game is so dependent on his mental condition…and the injuries do not help either…I hope he will be able to overcome those inner self demons otherwise he will continue to lose matches that he had under his belt…

    • Novak has improved his game a lot… and novak did not lose RG because he was mentally not tough, he lost because of wrong tactics! BB later admitted that during wimbledon and it made sense. I was saying it throughout that match that novak’s got the tactics wrong today. There was also some arguments between vajda and BB regarding the tactics in that match….. Apart from Novak’s play, stan was EXTREMELY good…he blew federer away in 3 sets without facing BP and was playing like a terminator….

      And people are just focusing on fed’s age and think even this fed is challening novak…..what people are missing is how tremendously federer has improved his game! he is a master tactician now, he has a much better backhand now and he is SO MUCH BETTER at the net! he can approach the net much better now and volleys pretty well….Fed’s improved his game a lot to make up for his age… Remember what he did to Murray at Wimbledon?? ! oh, and fed’s serve is better than ever too!

      • October 18, 2015 at 1:24 pm
        —and novak did not lose RG because he was mentally not tough, he lost because of wrong tactics! BB later admitted that during wimbledon and it made sense…There was also some arguments between vajda and BB regarding the tactics in that match—
        ===
        .
        BB was blamed for “not giving the right support” [gestures to motivate] to Djoko during the RG final.
        https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRmsNiMUEAE8pGn.png:medium
        .
        During Wimbledon, BB confirmed use of special signals (i.e. on-court coaching).

      • he also talked about using the wrong tactics going into the match when he was giving an interview in the studio at wimbledon….if interested, you can watch that video.

      • @vamosrafa,

        we can then agree to disagree. My opinion is Novak lost in the RG final because Wawa was better! Simple as that. So are you saying that he lost the AO 2014 also because of the bad tactics? So Boris had a year and a half to develop a working tactics against Wawa and he failed to find an answer? Maybe Boris should get fired then… 🙂

        While some of you argue here that Novak is unbeatable and his tennis has so much improved that nobody can challenge him, how come he failed to win the title (again!), the one that he cares about the most? Too bad one can not read the Serbian press…you would be able to see all the hype and all the significance they place on the RG title which puts enormous pressure on Novak… he lost that final because his mental toughness is not given and it can be challenged…and when challenged mentally he gets beaten by the players who play well and who most of all believe they can win, just like Wawa did…

        All of you here describing Novak as the current and future GOD of tennis (judging by your visionary views which I tend to interpret as rather utopist views) I see only as pure speculation. I still think it’s lack of opposition rather than Novak’s superiority…We will see if Novak can remain “superhuman” which I highly doubt…he has a lot of points to defend next year…

        Sure, one cannot ignore Novak’s huge talent…his baseline game is perfect because his body allows him to do it…OTOH his net play, his forehand smashes are still subject to UEs…it’s just that he does it so rarely because he mostly rely on his baseline game that it hardly gets noted…Rafa’s backhand smash is so better than Novak’s even this year when Rafa’s is nowhere near his best…

        Of course, if Novak proves me wrong and makes another conquests next year I will gladly admit to my wrong theory and will sincerely congratulate his fans as well as all of those fortune tellers who exist on this site… 🙂

  21. I doubt Rafa will dominate again, at best its a shared dominance with Novak, with Novak winning the AO and Wimbledon and Rafa the FO and USO. They may split the Masters like each winning three and the other three won by Murray/Fed and someone else. The WTF may be Novak’s unless Rafa steps it up and wins it.

    It all depends which Rafa we will be seeing next year and how’s the competition then.

  22. Outstanding again Djokovic with Masters Series tile # 25. He has played 7 masters series events this year winning 5 and getting to the final of 2, cant recall the last time someone was so dominant at majors and also masters series events. Unfortunately on a Djokovic thread most of the discussion is about unnecessary stuff related Rafa Nadal. Nothing new, every thread here ultimately turns into a Rafa Nadal thread. If you want to discuss things related to Rafa why not post on his thread?

  23. Rafa needs to get his forehand firing a lot more…. he needs more penetration….plus, he must gain the confidence to be able to change direction in his forehand in key moments of the match… and he is certainly not as dynamic in his movement as vintage rafa would be… his backhand side is more attack-able due to this …..he is lacking some explosiveness in his movement but that will come with time….I believe that time is not far away…

    Rafa’s made it clear in his interview that from now on he will be returning serve from close to the baseline and he will try to maintain a positive court position throughout the match…. this is out of his comfort zone so he needs a bit more time..I am glad he is adapting!

  24. Novak has upped his game definitely. His net approaches have improvecd, his feel when at the net has improved and his court position, his serve, his volleying, his shot selection and court craft, almost everything has improved. He’s now a complete or near complete player. Its incredible how well he can change direction at will, able to create all the angles and now even able to vary the pace and deals with the change of pace from his opponents quite well. He’s now able to rush his opponents into errors too.

    I think Novak is now the bigger monster than Fed at his peak, for he may soon win the FO if Rafa can’t get back to his high level and if Stan starts to decline and can no longer hold back Novak. He unlike Fed, may win some more clay court masters and he’s only two HC slams away from Fed’s HC slam record and two WTF away from Fed’s too. He may soon hold the Masters record and also complete the set at Cincy, not to mention winning the Olympic gold next year.

    Another scary thing is he still has time to win one more Madrid and two Cincy to make it multiple titles at each Masters! He already has the highest prize money won in a single season, in 2015, breaking Rafa’s 2013 record and he’s now chasing Fed’s career prize money won record.

    Its just so incredible what Novak has achieved in five years, esp the no. of Masters titles won. Will the rest of the field, Rafa included, please step up and stop this monster?

    • yup…I am not sure why so many rafans are in denial that novak is simply benefiting from a weak era :S he is a MONSTER out there….scary to be honest…all the improvements you have talked about in your post, Luckystar, I agree with them . For me , however , the biggest improvement is in his forehand! it has become such a big weapon! it was so easy to draw attack-able shots from his forehands in the past but now he is eats his opponents with that shot. He was trading CC blows with fed’s forehand in Wimbledon and USO finals and we do realize fed arguably has the best forehand ever?!

      Novak’s got the best CC regulation forehand at the moment… he lacks some firepower as compared to roger’s and rafa’s forehand but he changes direction with such ease … he has countered rafa’s inside out forehands by hitting forhands DTL’s so effectively so it is imperative rafa changes direction more often.

      I don’t even want to think of the records novak can make. Right now, I am hoping Rafa will be ready for 2016 and he will change the dynamics. Rafa also needs to improve his fitness , no doubt about that….he cannot afford to get tired in slams!

  25. As a matter of fact Nole was challenging Rafa way back in 2006* but in those days he simply retired from any match when he felt he wasn’t going to win. Rafa made Novak the player he is today although it took him till 2011 before he beat Rafa on clay for the first time.

    *the year he famously said ‘I was in control of the match’. And he went on to add ‘I’m telling you Rafa is not invincible on clay’.

    • yeah…but that’s true for all three of fed, novak , rafa…..at diff points, they have made each other so much better players… rafa sweeped the NA hard court swing in 2013 and novak has a big role in bringing about those improvements…. similarly, fed attributes his improved backhand to rafa!

      • You have to feel a bit for Andy Murray. He will always be regarded as the junior of the Big Four due to his Slam record but there is always one or even more of them to get past to win the big titles.

      • True and probably the biggest benefciary was Rafa who spent all those years as No.2 to Federer and learn to adapt his game to grass and hard courts to arrive at their present h2h.

  26. Ricky: Glad to know you respect Murray’s achievements. A lot of people (including many pundits) don’t bother to look beyond the stats. Earlier this year even Koenig declared categorically Murray could no longer be counted as one of the Big Four without bothering to mentioning his ranking had slipped because he had been out of action for months after back surgery.

  27. I don’t see why anyone would think Murray doesn’t belong in the Big Four. He’s been ranked in the top four consistently with the one exception being when he had back surgery. As Ricky stated, he’s won Wimbledon and the USO and the Olympic gold medal. That’s not too shabby.

  28. 64aces is right. This discussion belongs on Rafa’s page. It would make his page look much more respectable as opposed to Instagram fan selfies ruling the day.

    Lucky, VR, ed and nats are the most knowledgeable tennis rafans here. Great discussion you guys!

    • October 18, 2015 at 2:57 pm,

      If I remember correctly, someone has made a huge longtime effort to turn Rafa’s page(s) into his beloved players’ pages…

    • May I point out that virtually all the points being discussed here appertain to today’s final which, but for a few careless mistakes and unlucky net cords, would have been between Rafa and Novak. Ergo, it is unrealistic to analyse Novak’s prowess without referencing his closest rival. Tennisfan’s suggestion of banishing the follow up discussion to separate player pages is patently nonsensical.

      • ^I agree. I don’t understand how anyone could possibly state that it’s all about Rafa. I remember reading this kind of thing after the USO final and felt the need to point out at that time, the number of comments on that topic thread. I believe it was something close to 400 comments. There was an active, lively discussion about Fed and Novak on that topic thread, despite the fact that the majority of fans here are Rafa fans.

        I also don’t see anything wrong with bringing Rafa into the discussion. It is true that he is Novak’s rival. He came thisclose to getting into the final to meet him again. It’s natural to discuss these two players.

        I certainly do not agree that the discussion should be relegated to player pages.

      • mmmmmmm…. really? What about the one directly above yours? Are these really pertinent to today’s match?

        Such as this one.

        https://tenngrand.com/2015/10/17/shanghai-final-preview-and-pick-djokovic-vs-tsonga/comment-page-1/#comment-220620

        And pretty much every post on this thread by same poster like this one…

        augusta08 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 4:23 pm
        Nope, I can’t see into your head.

        and this one…

        augusta08 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 2:47 pm
        You should let the ATP know that the rules are absurd.

        and this one…

        augusta08 says:
        October 18, 2015 at 1:13 pm.
        I have read for more than 5 years that “Federer has managaed his schedule astutely for years…” (i.e. since I started to visit Tennistalk)…

  29. I said Rafa missed the boat in 2009 and that’s my opinion. It’s obvious that Rafa had Fed’s numbers at the slams during that period and so he not winning the channel slams that year because of his injuries was some lost opportunities for him to add to his slams, his weeks at no.1 and also his legacy.

    The contention about the Rafa slam or the Novak slam, it didn’t matter whether Rafa came short of two or three matches of winning it, it’s still a chance to win all four slams in a row after winning the third one, and Rafa lost in the QF at the AO because he injured his thigh during the match and that’s something unfortunate.

    We call it so and so’s slam just to distinguish who’s the one on the verge of collecting all four in a row, if not how are we going to address or acknowledge that achievement? It’s not only a career slam but it’s not necessarily a calendar slam either. I can’t believe some people could be so bothered by the term used to acknowledge that achievement.

  30. I agree regarding the issue of naming these slams. What else can we call it? Because it’s not the calendar slam, everyone seemed to jump on the idea to name it after the player who was trying to accomplish the feat of winning four slams in a row, not in the same calendar year.

    I also agree that the number of matches by which any player did not accomplish said feat, is irrelevant. The important factor is that said player had the opportunity at all. We know that it doesn’t come along that often. Otherwise someone would have done it already.

    Fed, Rafa and Novak have all their chance. None of them accomplished it. Fact. Quibbling over whether it was one match or two matches means nothing, because TennisFan has said that the important thing is that it didn’t happen. For all of them.

  31. BTW, we also heard of the Serena slam after Serena Williams successfully won all four in a row but not within a calendar year, so that’s not a term invented by people here. It’s that the term ‘so and so slam’ is used by the tennis playing, commentating and viewing communities.

  32. No I feel quite satisfied actually. There’s still a charm around it which the career Slam has lost ( or rather never had because it was manufactured to support the Agassi PR parade which the media ran with in subsequent generations).

  33. By the way: Happy Birthday Martina! Nobody refers to the “Martina Slam”, even though she achieved six-in-a-row beginning at Wimbledon 1983. This equals Margaret Court (from US Open 1969 to AO 1971) as the longest winning streak in Open Era history.

    Her one and only loss in all competitions in 1983 came at what was then the year’s opening slam, Roland Garros, when she fell to a complete nobody called Kathleen Horvath despite taking the second set by 6-0; the following year she lost just two matches, an early non-slam event to Hana Mandlikova and then – catastrophically, à la Serena – she messed up the AO semi ( when it was the last event of the calendar year) to Helena Sukova 6-1, 3-6, 5-7. In both losing slam matches she won more points than the winner.

    Maureen “Little Mo” Connolly similarly lost just one singles match in all of 1953 (to Beverly Fleitz), but she secured all the slams – to be joined by Court [1970] and Stefanie “Steffi” Graf [1988], the only women to achieve this to date. Martina never did this, but she achieved so much else it is worth remembering her on her big day.

  34. World No. 2 Andy Murray will have a 580 point lead on World No. 3 Federer tomorrow and leads him by 1120 points in the Race to London.

    It will be Andy’s 2nd week at No. 2 this year.

      • c’mon I do not need to indicate who here is arguing that Novak is unbeatable…you just need to
        go through the praises Novak receives on this site from Rafans…I think Nole’s fans could learn from it…they would certainly get ashamed of how little support and admiration they are able to articulate for their guy… 🙂

        BTW I am one of those fans who prefer Fed over Novak unlike you… and if Rafa failed, I would rather have Fed hold those records than Novak mostly because I appreciate Fed’s tennis better. I really admire Fed’s serve and volley game, I am so amazed with his tactical approach to each mach and the variety of play he disposes…and most of all I appreciate his refusal to be a boring baseliner…I am aware that Fed has made Rafa a better player and I am grateful for that…and if anyone recognizes that it’s Rafa himself…

        I also like Fed standing up for himself…I love when his responses to the press are all about him because IMO that is how it should be…he is the one who always assessed his own game and said: I did not play well, rather than praising his rival’s game…and even though most of you here would disapprove of it, I wish Rafa was like that instead of constantly marveling his opponents game…

        one more thing…I am surrounded by Novak’s fans and I get to hear about his superiority all the time…hence this opposition and revolt in me… 🙂

      • nats, I think I’m in the minority here preferring Nole to Fed.

        I seriously don’t see anyone here claiming that Nole is unbeatable. Sure, I for one amongst a few like NNY and luckystar actually picked Murray to win yesterday.

        Also, Fed is not being honest and is disrespectful when he blames his losses on luck as he did against Nole at the US Open, tells the French crowd to shut up when they prematurely cheered for him before the point had ended and cursed Andy Murray in Australia.

        However, he is dominating more than any player has ever dominated in the open era ATM.

        I can understand where you are coming from (pun intended) being in Serbia, but in the rest of the world (other than Spain), it’s just as bad with fed fans and the NY crowd was a peRFect example of this.

      • October 18, 2015 at 9:47 pm
        —Fed…tells the French crowd to shut up when they prematurely cheered for him before the point had ended —
        ===
        .
        The poster @9:47 pm is spreading a fake story that the crowd cheered for Fed! !!!
        Actually, Fed screamed ‘Shut up!’ after he hit the ball into the net and the spectators cheered on his OPPONENT (Delpo)! It happened in 2012 at Roland Garros. (Videos are available on demand.)

      • The Djokovic camp was literally heckling him even when he had given the point to Novak. It was at Monte Carlo in 2008 and Fed told them to be quiet.
        But yeah I suppose this stuff boosts your morale and helps to deal with Fed’s glorious career trajectory a bit better. :p Even if wrong in material particulars such has ‘facts.’ :p

      • Love Fed better than Djoko. Djoko’s family makes weird accusations, rejoices prematurely etc. Fed put them in their place. Good for him!

  35. @ hawkeye 9:47,

    I appreciate your own point of view on Fed…I still think he is allowed to blame it on luck or any other reason. I think players should primarily reflect on their own game and offer assessments/reasons for their losses rather than having to go into analysis of the game of their opponents…but it is probably subjective view of mine and dependent on which player one likes more…and the press of course can be really annoying and insistant in their questions…

    It must be that I am just so disappointed in Rafa that makes me less appreciative of Novak…however it shall by no means be interpreted as my refusal to recognize his achievements…I really admire him…it is just that I expect at some point in the near future his dominance will be stopped…

    BTW, I do not come from Serbia. I come from Montenegro (it used to be Serbia and Montenegro). We gained our independence in 2006. 🙂

  36. It’s entirely possible that Novak’s dominance will stop. It’s not out of the question. I remember many pundits and so-called experts saying in 2011 that Novak would dominate. However, that did not happen. He was able to get back to #1, but in 2012, 2013 and 2014, the slams were pretty evenly distributed.

    I think the Rafa’s slump is one reason why Novak has been able to dominate this year. We know what Rafa can do when he’s at his best. In fact, he’s gotten the better of Novak in slams for the last few years. After that 2012 AO loss, he’s gotten the better of him when they’ve met in slams.

    I never liked Novak, especially earlier in his career. The truth is that I don’t like either him or Fed. I don’t know that I have a preference as to who will have all the records. I tend to agree with hawkeye about Fed’s behavior and his fanatic fans. But I can understand why someone who has to listen to the Serbian media would have had their fill of Novak! 🙂

    • I too don’t like either Fed or Novak but I can appreciate their tennis and will be objective enough to point out where they excel but also where their weaknesses are when I see them. They both worked hard and with their talent, earned what they deserved.

      Praising their game doesnt mean that I am no longer a Rafa fan, for I’ll always appreciate Rafa, both as a tennis player and as a fellow human being, and I’ll always wish him well. Rafa works equally hard if not harder, and I do feel hes the most talented of them all. Without a serve as good as theirs, and without a solid enough BHDTL that he could hit regularly, he was still able to beat him more than they beat him, and earned his fair share of titles and major ones too. Just imagine how good Rafa will be if he can have those two additional weapons in his tool box! We got a glimpse of how a big serve helped Rafa to be unbeatable at the USO in 2010. We got a glimpse of a good enough BHDTL in that FO2013 SF and also the final. Its just that both weapons weren’t being developed or properly developed from young, hence I feel Rafa’s potential has not being fully realized.

      Rafa did not go to a tennis academy to learn his tennis skills and his uncle concentrated more on his mental focus and his ability to withstand pressure on the tennis court but allowed Rafa to develop his unorthdox tennis strokes. Rafa was motivated enough to play doubles at a young age and sometimes partnered his seniors like Moya just to pick up skills playing at the net. Hes now a competent volleyer and is very good when at the net.

      I do believe that Rafa when at his best could stop this Novak, at least at the FO and the USO. He together with Stan will make it tough for Novak at the AO ( Novak wasnt all that conquering during his AO and also USO finals this year anyway, digging deep to win). Its at the Wimbledon that I find no one will stop Novak unless Murray or some young guns can step up.

      • lucky,

        That’s pretty much how I feel. I do not begrudge Fed and Novak’s tennis and their hard work. I do appreciate what they have done in this sport. I can respect that. But Rafa will always be my one and only favorite.

        I also think about what Rafa might have done without all of those injuries that have cost him precious time in his career. I give him a lot of credit for hanging in there and trying to work on his game and his mental or emotional issues.

        Paul Annacone said something really interesting during Rafa’s match with Tsonga. It was in the beginning. He was talking about Rafa’s struggles this year and he said this – all players have their mental ups and downs in their careers. It happens to all of them. Then he said that Rafa has had to work on his this year. What I liked is that he made it simple. No extensive psychoanalysis. He just pointed out that players do go through this kind of thing. It’s not like Rafa is the first one who’s ever experienced it. He has always been very appreciative and respectful of Rafa and his tennis. I enjoy his commentary because he remains objective and also points out little details, nuggets of info that are good to know.

    • 30% of Montenegrin population declares themselves as Serbs…they still hold their hopes that Montenegro will get back with Serbia in the future…they are more pro-Russian (after all we are Slavic country) However, they are minority as Montenegro consist of various nations…Montenegrins OTOH want to join EU and NATO which is strongly opposed by Serb minority…this is just to give you quick political background… 🙂

      More importantly, Novak’s grandfather originates from Montenegro as he was born here…some people claim he is therefore not Serb but Montenegrin instead…this is where all the support comes from…however, Novak never claims he is Montenegrin, but accepts the hospitality of Montenegro, holds properties in Montenegro and has huge fan base…
      people cheering for Rafa or Fed to that end are not well received…when I explain that I was cheering for Rafa even before Novak was considered a force in tennis and that I have nothing against Novak but simply like Rafa better, they generally judge me and disapprove…it is not easy to be non-Novak fan here… 🙂

  37. I agree with native. Unlikely that Djoko will have as good a 2016 as this year.
    I have nothing against Djoko but his fanatical fans make life intolerable when he is winning. So I always root against him.

  38. That reminds me. Where is RITB? vr attacked her viciously assuming she was me but Ricky neither deleted that post nor gave vr any warning although Ricky knew that RITB is not me. It is a pity she is missing. She is a class apart. Somebody on tennis-x also expressed regret at nadalista’s absence. I am flattered of course that I am mistaken for her but sadly I am not she. Anyway guys as long as you don’t troll or attack loyal Rafa fans for defending Rafa, I have no issues with any of you. As a matter of fact, I love hawkeye when he is not trolling. Joint favorite with RITB. Since Ricky seems to be moderating, hopefully one will see more of the “creative genius”, rather than the annoying troll.
    I am not entertaining any hope about return of Rafa the invincible until I actually see him defeat Djoko. In fact I am ashamed to say I was happy Rafa lost to Tsonga as my battered heart cannot take his defeats to Djoko any more. And it is obvious Rafa is still not at the level at which he can beat Djoko. As vr pointed out, Rafa’s movement still needs some work and he has to have his forehand and backhand down the line firing on all cylinders. And yes, he needs a better serve.

  39. @ pat lemon,

    for some strange reason (or I am suddenly being under moderation) my response to you does not come through…I will repost it here to see if it gets through this time..

    30% of Montenegrin population declares themselves as Serbs…they still hold their hopes that Montenegro will get back with Serbia in the future…they are more pro-Russian (after all we are Slavic country) However, they are minority as Montenegro consist of various nations…Montenegrins OTOH want to join EU and NATO which is strongly opposed by Serb minority…this is just to give you quick political background… 🙂

    More importantly, Novak’s grandfather originates from Montenegro as he was born here…some people claim he is therefore not Serb but Montenegrin instead…this is where all the support comes from…however, Novak never claims he is Montenegrin, but accepts the hospitality of Montenegro, holds properties in Montenegro and has huge fan base…
    people cheering for Rafa or Fed to that end are not well received…when I explain that I was cheering for Rafa even before Novak was considered a force in tennis and that I have nothing against Novak but simply like Rafa better, they generally judge me and disapprove…it is not easy to be non-Novak fan here… 🙂

  40. What continually amazes me are people (who know SFA about tennis and have usually only seen the odd match on TV) yet refer to themselves as Federer fans. What bugs all his fans is a bunch of young upstarts came along and proved he was not invincible – Rafa being the main culprit. It will forever be thus even if Djokovic were to overtake Rafa in the h2h stats. I long ago gave up on pushing hot treacle upstairs.

  41. Thanks for balkan history. I think it’s kind of natural that people like their own guy. Scots like Murray, etc. Serbs like Nole.
    I am american by way of ancestry from Holland Germany france but I like Nole and not really a fan of isner but sock is ok. Not a kohls, Tsonga,Haase fan either because of my nationality.. People just like who they like.

    • I’m American and I root for Isner and sock for most part unless they r playing fed or Stan but that’s also partially cuz some of my family is from Switzerland so u got a point there. Also fed and Stan r just smooth to watch imo especially fed for obvious reasons and stan’s backhand is just gold.

      • Rooting for players from your country makes sense. Not sure anyone roots for players because “some of my family is from there.” The more plausible reason is because they are fun to watch, as you pointed out.

  42. My favorite has nothing to do with where I come from. Borg was the first tennis love of my life and he was Swedish. After that I did not have a favorite, however when Lendl came along I was a fan. I thought he was much misunderstood and also liked his game. He was Czech.

    Now it’s Rafa and he’s from Spain. It’s not something I even think about. I like who I like. There are other players whose games I enjoy and will support, like Murray. I do like Sock and hope he can keep on doing well. I love watching Monfils when he’s on. So athletic and entertaining. But their nationality is just not much of a factor for me.

  43. The only time patriosm plays a part is during the Davis Cup and the Olympics.
    I was never a fan of Henman (too preppy for my taste) but I began following Muzza when he became the USO junior champion. I vaguely knew there was a player named Rafa in those days but had never seen him play. I came under his spell a year later when I saw him play at Roland Garros in 2005 and and have never looked back.

    I really like Andy’s unconventional attitude and the fact he does not suffer fools gladly. He is undoubtedlymy number 2 favourite and I continue to follow his progress with keen interest and root for him against all comers apart from Rafa.

  44. These numbers are staggering

    So in case you haven’t heard, here’s what Djokovic has accomplished since losing in the semifinals of Shanghai last year, a period spanning 16 tournaments and one Davis Cup rubber:

    Won 82 of 87 matches, dropping just 35 sets.
    Won 31 of 35 matches against the top 10, losing just 22 sets.
    Won 13 of 16 matches against the top five, losing just 15 sets.
    Reached the final of 15 out of 16 tournaments, including all four Grand Slams and all eight Masters events he entered.
    Won 11 out of 16 tournaments, including three of four Grand Slams and six of eight Masters he entered.

  45. This is another weak era. Fed is old but at age 34 he reached two consecutive slam finals! Like old Agassi, old Fed is thriving but cannot beat the ONE. Rafa is slumping so much that we celebrate if he gets past Fognini. No one except a Djoker fan can say Rafa is in top form. Murray has regressed. His body is hurting or he is not motivated. The rest are the field. Djoko has no rivals and this is worse than 2006 because then Fed’s rivals were young and upcoming but this year the rivals are old and slumping. Next year will be the same unless Djoko starts slumping or some young guy steps up or Rafa comes back. Or Djoko gets tired of thrashing old and injured rivals and announces his retirement!

  46. Actually, Rafa’s 2013 right up to Miami 2014 would also be quite stellar. We can only speculate about the AO outcome should there be no back issue; that aside, Rafa had reached 14 finals in 2013, plus another 4 finals out of 5 events played starting from Doha 2014 to Miami 2014, ie 18 finals out of 22 events played, winning 12 of them. Its at Wimbledon that he failed badly in 2013, and during that stretch from Chile to Beijing 2013, Rafa also reached 13 finals out of 14 events played and won 10.

    Fed’s 2005 to 2006 seasons were also as stellar if not better than Novak’s 2014 to 2015 seasons.

  47. Luckystar, great post. Rafa’s 2013 was unreal and he did it when Djoko was in great form. No weak era. He beat Djoko on hard courts, not just on clay.

  48. Yes, Novak was playing at a high level in 2013 and it was Rafa who stopped him at the SF stages at FO and Montreal and Novak was still reaching the finals at Wimbledon and USO (stopped by Murray and Rafa respectively). Novak also had a clean sweep at the Asian and the Indoor swings, so Rafa was playing at a stellar level to be able to edge Novak for the year end no.1 ranking.

    Murray was at least competitive until the USO and we had Delpo throughout the season playing very well too. I do feel that in 2013 the field was stronger than now, with Stan too challenging Novak at the AO and USO that year. Its only Fed who’s suffering from his back injury and so was not having a good season.

      • I think its pointless to speculate about what could have been, but if we are at it then I think Djokovic should have won US open in 2014 too but he lost to Nishikori.

      • True Del Po would’ve won at least five slams IMO. The guy was 20 when he won NY and he was able to climb rankings so quickly every time he came back from injury. Without injuries this guy would be one of the biggest forces in the game today. So sad that his career has truly been plagued by injury.

    • Yeah but nadal got penalized for not playing a full season and a poor display at Wimbledon when ITF decided to give Djokovic the ITF World Champion title, despite the fact that Djokovic was world # 2.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




Skip to toolbar