No surprise on the men's side: Djokovic, Federer cruise into final

There may have been a stunner on the women’s side on Friday at the U.S. Open, but the men’s semifinals could not have been more straightforward.

And dominance by Roger Federer in the nightcap could not have been less surprising. Federer, who did not drop a set en route to the Cincinnati title last month and is doing the same so far in New York, clobbered fellow Swiss Stan Wawrinka 6-4, 6-3, 6-1 to reach his first final at this event since 2009.

The 34-year-old fired 10 aces while double-faulting only twice and he was not broken a single time. He finished with more winners than Wawrinka (29 to 25) despite committing almost half as many unforced errors (17 to 30).

“(I) didn’t play my best game,” Wawrinka lamented. “Didn’t serve well and everything. But basically it’s him; the way he’s playing. [Since] Wimbledon, he is starting already at the different level. He came back (in) Cincinnati at a completely different level. Here also. If [he keeps] this level, he’s going to be tough to beat.”

“I wasn’t quite sure if I was going to play this aggressive against Stan, because when he’s on he presents a very different challenge [from] all the players I have played thus far in this tournament,” Federer explained. “But now that I have been able to do it also against Stan definitely gives me confidence that maybe I can also do it against Novak (Djokovic) this way.”

It will be Federer vs. Djokovic on Sunday because the world No. 1 made extremely quick work of Marin Cilic in the first semifinal. Hobbled by a minor ankle injury, Cilic–the defending champion–bowed out in 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 blowout.

Djokovic faced only one break point and saved it easily early in the second set. The top-seeded Serb committed a mere 13 errors as he booked a spot in his fourth major final of the year (he is 2-1 in title matches, losing only to Wawrinka at the French Open).

“It felt great to be able to perform as well as I did today at this stage of a tournament, knowing that Marin carried that injury for last couple of matches,” Djokovic commented. “I didn’t allow that fact to distract me too much. I just wanted to concentrate on what I needed to do on the court and come out with the right intensity.

“All in all, it was from my side a very solid match and I take that as a confidence booster for the final.”

Get your popcorn ready for that final. No. 1 vs. No. 2–it doesn’t get any better.

[polldaddy poll=9072517]

48 Comments on No surprise on the men's side: Djokovic, Federer cruise into final

  1. I’ll bet that the Novak of Wimbledon 2015 will turn up to play. To me its Fed who wants it more, not Novak. Novak has time on his side, unlike Fed. Fed missed a very good chance last year so he will be more eager to get this one.

    • This is what I am thinking. Even though I am going back and forth with my prediction, I sense that Novak will come out and play some great tennis. I also absolutely agree that Fed wants it more. Novak will have his chances. He’s in the prime of his career.

  2. Going back to the Ladies Championships, the presentation ceremony was tailored made for Serena with 2 African American women in attendance just like the presentation ceremony at the AO 2009 had been tailored made for Roger beating Rafa.

    The Americans did well in swallowing their disappointment with dignity which the Australians couldn’t manage.

    • ^^^lol. You’re right the crowd were exemplary during the match and the presentation. In fact throughout the tournament I was impressed by the even handed support shown by the crowd to all the competitors (Donald Young matches being the exception).

      It didn’t happen during the final but I’ve been puzzled why in all other matches the spectators were constantly coming and going. Surely the marshals and security guys should have kept them under better control. The poor referees had to keep calling for them to sit down in the nearest seat so play could resume.

      • I’ve heard commies say the USO is loud and that’s the way it is, players just have to get used to people moving around with loud announcers promoting all sorts of things around the grounds and music between change of ends.

    • I thought they will get Steffi to present the award to Serena. Maybe Steffi declined as Steffi has happily given it all up and just does not want to be in the limelight anymore. She is happy being a mother and wife, running her charity and ofcourse managing her business with Andre.

      • I don’t get the idea that the player whose record has been broken should be happy about it. Who wants to see someone displace them in the annals of tennis history. I hope Rafa never has to present a trophy to another player surpassing his record at the FO…………he sure won’t be doing it happily.

  3. I am still torn as to whom to root for in todays final. I was clear in both Wimby’s that I was supporting Novak over Fed so that Fed stays at 7 in Wimby and does not inch closer to Rafa’s 9 at RG . Somehow I am inching towards Fed here. Either way its choosing between devil and deep sea.

    Reason I am inching towards Fed here is so that Novak gets stopped 🙂 and the chance of Rafa catching 17 now looks very remote, so 18 does not matter . If he manages to win 1 more slam, anything is possible thereafter as the confidence will come rushing back.

    • sanju, I agree with you. Fed has reached the level of diminishing returns in adulation from the media. One more slam would be neither here nor there, but if Djoker wins, the new media mantra about him is that he is super human, and a player from another planet, both of which do not really ring true. True he has achieved the best results in recent years, but as for being from another planet, I don’t think so.

    • He wont retire so soon now that Novak is another threat to his slam record.

      It makes no difference to us or Rafa who of Fed or Novak wins this USO. However, I cant stand the press or media or those commies who are mostly Fed supporters; just imagine how they would behave if Fed wins this. Theyre simply unbearable!

    • If by diminishing returns you mean results, then Roger is still doing better than Nadal at the moment. If by diminishing returns you mean a reduction in fan base, I suggest you visit the Open once.
      And more importantly, a player like Federer never loses his value. Borg didn’t and Roger won’t. They’re both the cornerstones of their respective generations. In fact, the bigger the underdog you make him, the more people will pull for him.

      • +1.

        For a Rafan, nadline10 spends an unhealthy portion of her time discussing Roger Federer. Anybody would think he mattered!

  4. Ricky’s Poll now has almost twice as many votes for Fed to win than for Djokovic. It can’t be explained by multiple voting because this site screens for that trick.

      • Novak has been reduced to a very slight 4/5 favourite no doubt due to increased betting on Roger after his lethal performances this week. Roger is 6/5.

        If 2015 Novak shows up, Roger will definitely win. Stan said Roger is at another level since Wimbly. I’ve said the same.

        That and Novak can’t typically handle the conditions in the finals at the USO.

        The crowd will have a big impact.

        I’ll be pulling for the spoiler but impressive if Fed does it. He will regain his GOAT status in my view if he does.

        Roger in three most likely, if not four.

        Ajde Nole!!!!!!

        #NID
        #LetsDoThis
        #NoleFam
        #Idemooooo

    • ed, i can remember just before the wimby final the bbc did one of their polls asking who would win and there was a huge result in favour of fed – something like 75% to 25% – i can remember roddick who was doing the commentary with henman saying ‘with all due respect to the viewers you are out of your mind if you think those are the real odds…’
      is more a poll about popularity no??

    • Ed, it is explained by the fact that Federer has many admirers who visit this site but leave the comments section to the more rabid breed of Rafan who made the old tennistalk site their own domain (and which, similarly, returned Federer atop many an opinion poll) before it was understandably discontinued. And that happened when Nadal was in his pomp. Given that vamosbrigade leads the way among Nadal fan sites, it is to be hoped that the Grandstand will accommodate a spectrum of views especially now that RN is not the story. Otherwise you have to wonder how long it can realistically continue. It has reached the point where in-fighting among the Rafans is now the norm, a classic end-of-empire trope.

      I give it six months.

  5. Amy: Agree it is probably driven by wishful thinking. It is still strange though because this site is not awash with Fedfans and the comments by posters are more evenly split.

  6. For me what it really comes down to in my opinion today is nerves and Roger simply doesn’t give an inch mentally.

    Nole is good but it only takes getting tight on a few critical points to make the difference between winning and losing.

    • fed is mentally stronger than nole??that’s debatable…ok nole will get worked up about the crowd being on his back and that could be his undoing but fed is capable of getting rattled by nole’s ros in particular as we saw at wimby…
      seem to remember that fed got very tight in the first set tie-breaker at wimby…if he does that again today then nole will probably win..

      • All players get tight. Even the best ones do. In the end, it’s a matter of semantics because you or I don’t know what goes on between a player’s ears. Federer has always been the one with more to lose-a side effect of the career he built-so the pressure on him is often multiplied as compared to the other guy. I’ll say he’s done an excellent job.

    • Roger a mental monster? You serious? He has lost 9 slam finals and lost many matches being match points up.

      Roger is definitely not the mentally strongest player on tour.

      • That’s not really an indicator of anything actually. Even on Roger’s worst days, it used to be damn hard to beat him. So everyone came looking like a hero against him every time they scored a victory. He’s made finals where he was far from his best. Both 2008/09 have those.

      • Does not change the fact that he has lost many many important matches in his career to both Rafa and Nole. He is not mentally the strongest player on tour by any long shot.

      • Most of the matches he’s lost to Novak are after he turned 30. So they’re not even indicators of mental toughness as far as I’m concerned. It’s a still a good and a very even match-up, even at majors.

        Nadal was a straight up poor match for him in core, technical sense so he was under even more pressure and then he got mono and the rivalry turned completely. Happens. He’s still the best as far as I’m concerned. It’s far easy to look ‘mentally tough’ when you’re a defensive player, playing on slow courts mostly, against a favourable match-up. For an attacker in an era tailor-made for backboarders, I repeat, Roger is the best.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.