2014 Wimbledon picks: Federer over Murray

First round
Djokovic over Golubev in 3, Stepanek over Cuevas in 3
Simon over Kravchuk in 3, Haase over Pospisil in 4
Youzhny over Ward in 5, Wang over Gonzalez in 4
Querrey over Klahn in 3, Melzer over Tsonga in 5
Gulbis over Zopp in 4, Stakhovsky over Berlocq in 4
Chardy over Cox in 3, Verdasco over Matosevic in 4
Cilic over Mathieu in 4, Edmund over Haider-Maurer in 4
Donskoy over Tomic in 5, Berdych over Hanescu in 3

Murray over Goffin in 3, Andujar over Rola in 5
Kamke over Hernych in 4, Bautista Agut over Johnson in 4
Anderson over Bedene in 3, Roger-Vasselin over Volandri in 3
Gabashvili over Puetz in 4, Fognini over Kuznetsov in 4
Dimitrov over Harrison in 3, Thiem over Saville in 4
Becker over Young in 5, Dolgopolov over Groth in 4
Seppi over Mayer in 4, Brown over Baghdatis in 4
Kuznetsov over Evans in 5, Ferrer over Carreno Busta in 3

Wawrinka over Sousa in 3, Lu over Nedovyesov in 4
Reister over Russell in 5, Istomin over Tursunov in 4
Lopez over Sugita is 3, Falla over Pavic in 3
Nieminen over Delbonis in 4, Isner over Smethurst in 3
Janowicz over Devvarman in 3, Hewitt over Przysiezny in 3
Mannarino over Riba in 3, Robredo over Lacko in 4
Mahut over Granollers in 4, Giraldo over Gimeno-Traver in 4
Muller over Benneteau in 5, Federer over Lorenzi in 3

Raonic over Ebden in 3, Sock over Herbert in 4
Kubot over Struff in 4, Garcia-Lopez over Lajovic in 4
Kohlschreiber over Sijsling in 3, Bolelli over Ito in 5
Kudla over Ilhan in 4, Nishikori over De Schepper in 5
Gasquet over Duckworth in 3, Kyrgios over Robert in 4
Vesely over Estrella Burgos in 3, Monfils over Jaziri in 3
Karlovic over Dancevic in 4, Kukushkin over Sela in 4
Rosol over Paire in 4, Nadal over Klizan in 3

Second round
Djokovic over Stepanek in 3
Simon over Haase in 5
Youzhny over Wang in 4
Melzer over Querrey in 4
Stakhovsky over Gulbis in 5
Verdasco over Chardy in 4
Cilic over Edmund in 4
Berdych over Donskoy in 4

Murray over Andujar in 3
Bautista Agut over Kamke in 4
Anderson over Roger-Vasselin in 4
Fognini over Gabashvili in 4
Dimitrov over Thiem in 4
Becker over Dolgopolov in 4
Seppi over Brown in 5
Ferrer over Kuznetsov in 3

Wawrinka over Lu in 3
Istomin over Reister in 3
Lopez over Falla in 4
Isner over Nieminen in 4
Hewitt over Janowicz in 4
Robredo over Mannarino in 4
Mahut over Giraldo in 5
Federer over Muller in 3

Raonic over Sock in 3
Kubot over Garcia-Lopez in 5
Kohlschreiber over Bolelli in 3
Nishikori over Kudla in 4
Gasquet over Kyrgios in 3
Monfils over Vesely in 4
Karlovic over Kukushkin in 4
Nadal over Rosol in 3

Third round
Djokovic over Simon in 3
Melzer over Youzhny in 4
Verdasco over Stakhovsky in 4
Berdych over Cilic in 4

Murray over Bautista Agut in 3
Anderson over Fognini in 3
Dimitrov over Becker in 4
Ferrer over Seppi in 3

Wawrinka over Istomin in 4
Lopez over Isner in 4
Hewitt over Robredo in 4
Federer over Mahut in 3

Raonic over Kubot in 3
Kohlschreiber over Nishikori in 4
Gasquet over Monfils in 4
Karlovic over Nadal in 4

Fourth round
Djokovic over Melzer in 3
Berdych over Verdasco in 5
Murray over Anderson in 3
Ferrer over Dimitrov in 4

Lopez over Wawrinka in 4
Federer over Hewitt in 3
Kohlschreiber over Raonic in 5
Gasquet over Karlovic in 4

Quarterfinals
Djokovic over Berdych in 4
Murray over Ferrer in 4

Federer over Lopez in 4
Kohlschreiber over Gasquet in 5

Semifinals
Murray over Djokovic in 5
Federer over Kohlschreiber in 3

Final
Federer over Murray in 4

[polldaddy poll=8141085]
[polldaddy poll=8141087]
[polldaddy poll=8141091]
[polldaddy poll=8141096]
[polldaddy poll=8126452]

Comments and your own predictions are appreciated!

469 Comments on 2014 Wimbledon picks: Federer over Murray

    • No hate here. I am very similar on my picks. Major differences were that I had BabyFed over Ferru, GGL over Gasquet, and Federer beating Djokovic in the final. Also have Baghdatis reaching round of 32 and I think Sijsling will give Kohlschreiber trouble. Nice to see a lot of people are picking Lopez and Federer to both do well. Almost forgot to mention that I have Tsonga reaching the second week. I know you love that pick. I heard Ben picked Jo to beat Novak.

      • Brown beats Rafa in Halle but goes down to baggy in the first round at Wimby! So much for Brown being in Rafa’s half hoping for another miracle!! Enough of the conspiracy, i say! Perhaps Baggy was just not having any of it!

  1. Ricky, please tell me that this is your idea of a joke. Rafa out in the third round to Karlovic? I am not even sure that Karlovic will get there! Rafa is not going to get knocked out in the early rounds this time.

    Fed to win? Really? Not gonna happen.

      • Ricky,

        My point is that Rafa is not losing to the likes of Karlovic. So it’s apparent that you think that Rafa getting knocked out early in Wimbledon the last two years will happen again this year.

        I don’t agree that Rafa’s going out in the third round. This year he’s going to make it to the second week.

      • If Rafa gets to the second week, I think he’s got a very good chance. The only way Fed can win is if Rafa gets knocked out early. But even then I don’t know that he can beat Novak or Murray even at Wimbledon. I think Murray’s got a better shot than Fed.

      • Yup….many here are saying that if there is no rafa to deal with, Fed will win Wimby. I think Murray will have an edge over Fed…

      • If Fed reaches the final, Muzz won’t be able to beat him. Fed and Rafa are different animals altogether in slam finals.

      • I would be stunned if Karlovic beats Nadal,the thing is how will Karlovic break Nadal? And we know Karlovic gets nervous in tiebreaks against top players, very poor vs top 5 in tiebreakers. Nadal very good vs big servers like Karlovic,Isner and Raonic.. Isner and Raonic would handled it better than dr Ivo in those tight situations.. Nadal?s biggest test will be Klizan in R1

  2. Ricky,
    My opinion is that of the big 4 rafa is the most likely to not make the semis. but if he they all make the semis I think rafa is the most likely to win. As he owns Federer, Murray has never beat him at Wimbledon and I don’t think Novak is as good on grass as people think. Rafa would beat fed in the semis however Fed is an almost certainty to get there where Rafa I am not confident at all.

  3. Some bold predictions, love it! Really intrigued by Nadal and personally, think he will go out to Klizan or Karlovic. I’m already regretting going for Klizan. However if he gets through the first three rounds unscathed, I think he then becomes the favourite to win the whole caboodle.

    I originally had Kohlschreiber to the QFs, but lost my nerve. I just can’t trust him to win four matches, as good a player as he can be on grass. I picked him to the QFs in 2011 I think and he bombed out R1. He should beat Sijsling but a tough start with a 0-3 H2H.

  4. Ricky – thanks for the wonderful predictions.
    This will turn out to be true as your prediction in 2012!
    This is Grass, anyone can beat mediocre Nadal here and if he reaches SF somehow then Fed will thrash him.
    Weep fan girls…

  5. “When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think sardines will be thrown into the sea”. Eric Cantona

  6. Rafa will, most likely, not reach the 2nd week. If he does, he is fav. to win Wimbledon.
    Fed will not beat Rafa even if they play in R1 (in semis Fed will lose in 3).

    My favourites are Murray, Djokovic, Federer in that order.
    Rafa is bit of an X-Factor. Will have to watch a match or 2 before we can make any predictions about his chances.

  7. I agree that we shud wait for rafa to play his opening match before assessing his chances. However, I still believe rafa is not going out in the first week this time.

    NOBODY is a better critic of his game than rafa himself ! He is completely honest and is extremely well self-aware. He is not like federer who always says he is playing well and the matches are on his racket. Rafa is different. He does not very often say he is feeling really good and confident about his game openly. He is saying it now ! This says something… Rafa is practicing quite well and there is no hesitation in his mind.

    Rafa is reaching week 2. I don’t know how many sets that will require but I am confident about it happening. I am not saying it is not possible that rafa will crash out early again but I do feel its highly unlikely.

    • @vamosrafa,

      I feel basically the same as you. It’s true that we need to see how Rafa looks in his first match. That will give us a sense of where he’s at. But I think you are right in believing that Rafa will not go out in the first week this time. When Rafa feels that he has something to prove, that’s when he can be his most dangerous.

      Of course there is a possibility that Rafa could crash out early, but I just think he’s ready to do well this time.

  8. The sun has been shining in the south of England for the last couple of weeks so the grass will not be as slippery as it was last year and Rafa is not playing until Tuesday, so there will be some wear and tare too so it won’t be fresh and lush. There were so many casualties last year.

    Darcis fell over badly during his match with Rafa and had to have surgery on his shoulder as a result. He said he did not feel much during the match but the next day he could hardly move it. I tripped and twisted my knee on the pavement 2 years ago and felt nothing until the next day and eventually had to have surgery to sort it out.

  9. Firstly, Karlovic can lose in any of his matches before R3. If we have a Rafa vs karlovic match, it will be tricky for rafa. Remember rafa vs Karlovic in Queens qtr final in 2008? Rafa won 6-7 7-6 7-6 and Karlovic hit 32 aces. Rafa has been the best in handling the big servers but on slick grass, karlovic will be a challenge. I don’t think Karlovic is winning that match . I would say Rafa in 4 instead of karlovic in 4.

    One of the issues rafa has on grass ,esp in week 1 is his ROS. When huge serve are directed to his forehand, it becomes difficult for him. Because of the court speed and conditions, rafa does not have time to take proper swings on the ball so he often blocks/chips forehand returns (as he lacks a compact forehand ROS swing like Federer or Djokovic or Murray). This can put him in trouble. Rosol benefitted him and so did Darcis last year and so did all those players who have pushed rafa hard in the first week of Wimby. karlovic ,however, does not have a good and consistent enough game to take adv of those chipped returns on regular enough basis and I believe karlovic’s 2nd serve is not THAT good. it’s attackable.

    Rafa will handle karlovic. I am not even thinking about his match. I just want Rafa to win his first two matches with conviction. he will be nervous but he will be very eager to play well.

    • @vamosrafa,

      I like your analysis of a possible third round match with Karlovic. I already said that Karlovic has to get there first. I don’t care if he happens to be in so-called good form right now. He has never been able to do anything at slams. I don’t see why at his age now that he would be able to take out Rafa. Of course it’s always a tough one for Rafa. But in a best three out of five, I like Rafa’s chances. I honestly am not going to think about Karlovic yet. Rafa has to get through his first two matches.

  10. “I feel like, yeah, if things click here, I should be able to win the tournament,” Federer said Saturday.

    Ricky I bet you read this comment nd picked Federer right?

  11. Oh, I see, thx nadline.
    Well, Ricky has been very contemporary with his predictions lately, FO = Nadal, Wimby = Federer 🙂
    It’s already very refreshing to read that Rafa is feeling confident about his knees on grass this year.

  12. I am not sure which is a bolder pick – Fed winning it all or Rafa losing to Karlovik? 😉

    BTW who has Fed picked as the favorite? I kinda trust his judgement? He usually tells it in his pressers

    • Absolutely. Fed’s 2009 and 2012 wins were because there was no Rafa in his way. Really, Rafa is the only player who can almost always stop Fed. Fed vs Andy or Nole is a toss up.

  13. I still think that as much as fed wants to avoid rafa , he has some willingness to play rafa on grass. fed has a big ego and I think he believes he can upset rafa on grass. I am not sure if he has the complete self-belief but on grass there will be some belief. He has tried and failed on clay infinite times. On hard courts, well he even lost in indoor last year. Grass is left. He would love to avoid rafa but he won’t hate is as much as he would at lets say, RG or AO.

    • I agree here. I think he wants to beat Rafa once in a slam before he retires. His motivation will be very high aat Wimby as it will be his best chance and if theroof is closed, he will be salivating 😉

  14. I wonder if Rafa wins Wimby like I am hoping and feeling since long (maybe more a wish ;-)) , wonder what so called xperts and so many folks on this form will have to say? 🙂

  15. Sanju – June 23, 2014 at 9:49 am
    ‘I wonder if Rafa wins Wimby like I am hoping and feeling since long (maybe more a wish ;-)) , wonder what so called xperts and so many folks on this form will have to say?’

    The same they’ve been saying (the xperts) all throughout Rafa’s career, blablabla, physicality, blablabla, unyielding spirit and competitive mindset, blablabla, and then they’d still give Nole as favourite to win the USO

  16. Why are most Rafans here putting this statement ‘ Most likely Rafa wont make the second week?’. I guess too scared with results of past 2 years

    And I thought I was pessimistic. I think I am better than many here 😉

  17. I understand people being skeptic about Rafa’s chances on grass…after all he went out TOO early in the two past attempts and he recently lost to Dustin Brown ?! for God sake…so why would anyone blame Ricky for predicting Rafa would go out to Ivo “the big hitter” who is playing his best tennis ever ATM…

    However, it is unpredictable Rafa we are talking about here…his No1 position is at stake…he knows he could earn some points here so he will fight harder than ever…his draw although looking difficult may as well serve him good since he will not need to play long points on the slippery grass in the early rounds…I think Rafa will beat Klizan although I expect Rafa to be nervous and Klizan to be hipped since EVERYONE now believes he could beat Rafa on grass which really makes Rafa’s life difficult…I hope Rafa’s serves well…those ‘body serves’ that Rafa invented recently are so effective…let’s see if he could produce some easy points against Klizan to shake him up…the first set is crucial…all I am afraid of is Rafa himself…I hope he believes he can do it…the rest will come…
    Vamos Rafa!

  18. I think we are realistic and take it one match at at time, Rafa’s last seasons here have been disastrous so there’s plenty of reasons to be wary. This year though, there are different sensations… but we won’t go as far as to say that there’s a good chance of winning the tournament even before it has started as some others do…

  19. All things aside, one really has to marvel at the fact that federer, at age 32 (almost 33), is still a genuine contender on slam level (at least at Wimby). We all know that Rafa is perhaps too big an obstacle for him but against djokovic and Murray, Fed will have a very good change. Rafa, then Murray and Djokovic in his order are fed’s biggest obstacles to an eight Wimby crown. Rafa is more than an obstacle though.

  20. Ricky already answered that:

    Ricky Dimon says:
    June 23, 2014 at 4:53 am

    agreed with this. Fed has basically no chance vs. Rafa.

  21. Nadal will be out in the first round and Federer in the second. Murray or Djokovic will likely win the title but I would love to be surprised by somebody else winning it. Would be great for tennis.

  22. tennis and sports overall tend to take care of themselves
    Fed’s smugness had reached critical levels when Rafa came along and shook the tennis world.
    This year’s RG has shown the first signs of mental fatigue for Rafa, maybe next year will be someone else’s turn to win, who knows?
    And look at what’s happened to the Spanish national football team in Brazil, there are just shifts in momentum. One can’t keep winning forever and it’s up to the new generations to step it up and show the enthusiasm and dedication of their predecessors

  23. yes Augusta, that’s correct.
    I meant to say that it was the first RG where I’ve seen Rafa ‘tired of winning’…

  24. I find the BBC coverage so incestuous. Even though I am British, I find it annoying that all the ‘experts’, presenters, journalists, the birds, the world and his wife have to promote Murray. Nothing’s changed even after he’s won the title. Last year we were greeted every morning with Sue Barker cooing about Laura Robson and Andy Murray. Every s i n g l e day, morning, noon and night.

    It’s an international competition isn’t it?

  25. Cheering for Rafa no doubt.
    Got to wait though and see him play his first match.

    Very difficult to make any predictions re Rafa given what transpired in the last couple of years.
    However, I strongly believe that if Rafa reaches the 2nd week, he will be fav.

  26. The responses of the Big 4 on the ATP site run true to form. Federer with his usual bravado talking up his own chances; Djokovic boasting about his chances but hedging his bets by talking about his injury problems; Andy being realistic, admitting he will be nervous in the early rounds and also accepting it will be a struggle to defend his title; Rafa, as always, never taking the possibility of winning for granted and refusing to look ahead beyond each round. But this year he is sounding quietly confident.

  27. Fantastic roar from the crowd as Andy comes onto court to start the defence of his title.
    People have been queuing since Saturday to get a place on Centre Court for this match.

  28. ed what exactly did Djoko say about his wrist again?

    I so want a Rafa Murray final here in Wimby. God please grant it to me.

  29. natashao2013 – June 23, 2014 at 12:11 pm
    ‘… and he is their nine-time Champion now…’
    Correction = ‘.. and he sis THE nine-time Champion now…’

      • I surfed Youtube. The difference between Fed fans and Rafa fans is that Fed fans have posted a video of his win at RG in 2009 “The French Open – Roger’s Standing ovation”, but Rafa fans have not made videos of NINE (!) standing ovations Rafa has received at RG after winning the trophy! That’s how people get the impression that only Fed has received ovations!

      • It’s more like the Rafa fans have spread the myth that Rafa is not treated well at the FO.
        I have only seen Rafa fan’s whining about that thing.

      • Rafa’s words here are consistent with his past criticisms of the French.

        First of all, he recognizes the “history” there and does not refute it.

        After a long pause to choose his words carefully, Rafa says, “The crowd here is ALMOST perfect every time.”

        Again, any time Rafa criticizes the crowd (only at the French BTW), it takes a lot!

        The French have historically been very disrespectful of Rafa. Everybody knows this.

        Sorry for the Rafans and federazzi who try to spread the myth that they have always respected Rafa.

        #HowManyTimes
        #YoureWelcome
        #Again

  30. Mind you, I think the response was OTT because it’s Andy and the BBC has be hyping it up no end. The crowd are never that exercised about the defending champion walking onto the court.

    Believe it or not, I missed it because I was on my dentist’s list for cancelled appointments, and they called me at 12.30 to be there for 12.45, just as I was getting excited for the great walk-on. The treatment didn’t take long so I was back whilst they were still warming up. I’m going to rewind to see them take to the court.

  31. I watched the walk-on now and I have to say, I have NEVER seen the defending champion get a standing ovation ever and I’ve been watching tennis for a few decades now.

  32. Does anyone have the slightest idea how the ATP decides which player to feature on their Home Page. Why Dolgo and Ferrer during Wimbledon?

  33. JMac is well and truly on board the Murray bandwagon. The sycophantic commentary on the BBC is really too extreme. It doesn’t matter how much they big Murray up, he still has to win the matches.

  34. I bet Rafa will be served more support/appreciation/admiration from the Wimby crowds tomorrow when he steps on the court than what he has ever received from the RG crowds…and it’s not only because nadline is there… 🙂

      • it does not matter whether you are physically there or not, you are still close enough to send him good vibes and enormous support from all the Rafans here… 🙂

        Vamos nadline! 😀

  35. About your comments on Rafa not tired of winning at RG, perhaps you’re right 🙂 a whole decade of winning there would be even more Epic, beyond legend if that’s possible 🙂

      • Rafa’s form and confidence has hardly ever been a concern for RF.
        Rafa turns up in the same way against him every time. It’s more of a concern which Fed turns up against him.

      • LOL..”Rafa’s form and confidence has hardly ever been a concern for RF.” Are you serious?? Rafa’s form is a HUGE concern for everyone including federer. how on earth can you say rafa always turns up the same way? The rafa of RG 2008, for example, makes RF’s form totally irrelevant ! On many occasions, Rafa is not playing his best tennis yet he is able to dig out a win over Federer ..but on some occasions, rafa is playing so well that he just destroys federer without giving him a chance

        Rafa’s performance in madrid 2009 , for e.g….rafa played a very average match (for reasons we know) which gave an in-form RF a winning chance !

        When rafa comes out playing his AGGRESSIVE BEST against federer, its almost a certain win for rafa, usually in a dominant fashion .. When rafa is playing vulnerable tennis or average tennis, THEN federer has a shot of beating him IF he is able to muster enough mental strength

  36. nadline, the US coverage is even worse. Al least you get coverage of a real contender.

    While the defending champ was playing today, we mostly had to watch American Sloan Stephens go out in straights followed by Ryan Harrison losing to BabyFed.

    I usually cheer against the Americans because the US coverage is forced to cover the real contenders.

    • Well, luckily Rafa and Murray are not in the same half of the draw, because when their matches clash we’ve had to watch Rafa on the Red Button which means you can’t record the match or pause or reverse and that also goes for nonentities like Laura Robson, Heather Watson, Dan Evans, James Ward etc. I too root against the lot of them so that we can have a better coverage.

      This has been going on for years since the days of Rusedski and Henman.

      • With that “logic”, this implies that all posters here besides you, nadline and abhirf are watching US coverage.

        Hilarious!

        Please gussie, the French open is over. Time for you to move on to spreading your next myth, for sure, no?

  37. Yet another Ricky pick bites the Dust(in).

    Too much credit given to players who beat Nadal when he’s nowhere near 100%.

    And Verdasco just because he had a deep run last year?

    (Same goes for picking Rafa to go out early dismissing his recent claim to be feeling well and wanting to do good. I can’t think of an example of Rafa being so positive entering a tournament and not doing well.)

    #HowManyTImes
    #YoullLearn

    • Two things stand out. It is rare for Rafa to sound so upbeat before any tournament let alone a Slam. Secondly, he is looking so relaxed and clearly enjoying himself – clearly the down-time in Majorca did him a world of good. Fingers crossed he brings that to the court.

      • agreed! I said this earlier…its very rare for rafa to be so upbeat…this won’t be wasted…rafa will strike ….watch out

  38. Watching Djokovic match now. No signs whatsoever of the ‘wrist problem’ but I have lost count of how many times today the pundits and commies have referred to it. You could be forgiven for thinking his arm was in plaster.

    • Djokovic said he is totally pain-free now so the commies and fans should stop discussing it i guess and focus on the tennis…the good thing is that all members of the big 4 are fit at the moment

      • It was kind of annoying to hear the commies go on and on about Novak’s wrist. He skipped an exho and looked good in his first match. So there’s nothing to talk about.

    • his wrist may suddenly start being a BIG ISSUE when Nole reaches semis or the final to that matter…or it may as well be the “vomiting case” or contact lenses or breathing problems…ridiculous…he should stop making excuses like that…

  39. Ricky’s picks that have gone down the tube
    Rola bt Andujar
    Puetz bt Gabashvilli
    Saville bt Thiem
    Tomic bt Donskoy

    • It’s impossible to get all these picks right. Nobody can get them right unless a fluke of miraculous proportions takes place. I don;t even know who some of these players are !

      • exactly ! lol…how on earth is one supposed to get these picks right when you don’t even know who these guys are lol…. Ricky is just doing his usual thing by calling all the matches… you can’t get these right too often

      • Rola played for Ohio State. Puetz played for Auburn. Saw both play in college.

        Saville i saw play last year in Atlanta. No idea how on Earth he beat Thiem.

    • Yes! Given that Wawrinka hasn’t done anything at Wimbledon in the past and his recent results. I like that pick!

  40. I have to admit, I’m nervous about Rafa’s match tomorrow. Just want to see Rafa play well at Wimbledon again.

    Vamos Rafa

    • well. you know what they say? lightning doesn’t strike in the same place twice…I think Rafa will be fine and win in 3 tight sets.

  41. So, let me understand this: Djokovic can’t get a Slam win these days to save his life and Wimby is asking if he will overtake Fed’s Slam tally????

    RT @Wimbledon : “Can #Djokovic overtake #Federer’s 17 Grand Slams? Tweet us #yes or #no using #TheWorld The stats so far… pic.twitter.com/j7xynW8r7w”

  42. I, too, am very nervous about Rafa’s match tomorrow. I was following the tweets of people who were at Rafa’s practice today. He played a practice set against Alejandro Falla (Roger’s opponent in the final in Halle), and lost the set 4-6. I assume he wanted to practice with Falla because Falla is a lefty and tomorrow he’ll be facing Klizan, also a lefty. One of the tweeters noted that Rafa was noticeably angry when he lost the set. The same tweeter also noted that Falla left the court “half-dead” but Rafa continued to practice with Marc Lopez.

  43. I think it’s normal to get butterflies before Rafa’s first match. But I am not going to read much into Rafa’s practice today with Falla. Practice is practice. I remember when Rafa was practicing well, yet it didn’t transfer to the court. That was his post AO funk and the lingering back problem.

    Rafa is well aware of what has happened the past two years. He seems determined to right the ship this time. He knows only too well how dangerous the early rounds can be. I expect him to be as ready as he can for his first match.

  44. filter – June 24, 2014 at 12:31 am
    If you say ‘should’, that’s just you stating your favouritism to Nadal losing. If you follow this up with ‘no doubt about it’, again it just shows that in your mind you are convinced that Rafa ‘should’ lose. Apart from your predilection your statement doesn’t really bring in any value to this thread since whether or not you are doubtless about Rafa’s defeat is inconsequential tu us all.

    • ^^I don’t know, @abhirf. This @filter certainly shares @Twinge’s antipathy towards Fedal with none of @Twinge’s caustic humour I am afraid! @filter just comes across as jealous and bitter. Bitterness without humour is, well………boring.

      Also, @Twinge was clearly and positively a Muzza fan. Hard to know who @filter supports to be honest. All I see are just anti-fedal posts from him (yes, gotta be a he), nothing positive about any player. Shame.

      • Bad for tennis? Easy Fedal.
        Good for tennis? Nishikori, Dimitrov, Raonic, Thiem, Gulbis, Dolgopolov, Tomic, Lajovic, Janowicz, del Potro. I could go on but new blood is badly needed at these type of major tournaments.

      • That’s an insult to twinge who had some great wit and entertaining personality. Twinge was a devout Muzza fan.

        filter is your basic fly-by-night dime-a-dozen one-dimensional troll with no imagination. Hardly worth responding to sad to say. Just throwing shite out to get a rise.

        Tomic? hahahahahaha, shows how much it knows about tennis.

  45. I sure hope Ricky’s Wawa prediction pans out, and early too, so we can stop being fed this sort of tripe:

    http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/06/25/sports/tennis/wimbledon-2014-wawrinka-steps-out-of-federers-shadow.html?_r=1

    “But what about now, after Wawrinka, the proverbial Everyman (if only in the context of world-class tennis), has in the last six months achieved what Federer has not done in two years — won a major and solved the riddle of Rafael Nadal?”

  46. But filter, no one hands greatness out for free they have to earn it. These young players have to do the same……………….beat the best to be the best. Rafa beat the World #1 at the age of 17 at their first meeting.

  47. All I can say ritb is that they obviously don’t want the facts to get in the way of a good story, also that they think Rafa is a riddle to be solved shows nothing but respect for him.

    I want Rafa and Stan to meet asap so that Rafa can kill the ridiculous assumptions that he beat a fit Rafa. They never even mention that Stan beat a fit Novak, which suggests to me that Novak doesn’t command the same respect as a tennis player as Rafa.

    • ” They never even mention that Stan beat a fit Novak, which suggests to me that Novak doesn’t command the same respect as a tennis player as Rafa.”

      True dat, well said……………

    • The Rafa-train just left Klizan station and is bearing down on the Fed station, with a scheduled stop at the Rosol station tomorrow. Scheduled maintenance will take place at the Fed station, before making another tilt at the Final station.

      Vamos!

      • That’s a statement. Not a question.

        And I agree. No. Nor on grass.

        Raonic is young. Stanifluke has had nine appearances compared to Raonic’s four and has only made it two rounds further than Raonic.

        Two years ago when Raonic was just 21, Fed beat Raonic on grass 6-7(4), 6-4, 7-6(3).

        Raonic is a much better player now and I am sure, Fed is happy to have Stanifluke in his comfy quarter instead of Raonic.

        #YoureWelcome

      • ^^ Just your assumption, no.

        Stan has been playing much better for past 1 year, improving his game. He did beat Fed this year.
        I can’t see how Raonic would have been a tougher opponent for Fed. He just has a big serve, while Stan has an all court game.

        And so much for the young guns when all they have done is wilt against the top guys on countless opponents. They have been schooled numerous times.

      • Check the Halle scoreline from TWO years ago.

        Fed choked under pressure of last chance for a career MC win.

        Other than MC, Stanifluke is a meagre 7-6 between AO and grass season this year and has never gone past the 4th round. His last four losses against players ranked 70, 35, 116 and 70.

        #15minutesOfFame
        #GameOver

      • There’s no need to check the scoreline. I watched that complete match.
        I have watched every Fed vs Raonic match. All Fed has to do is wait to get a read on that serve. It may cost him a set but not the match.
        Raonic still has a long way to go.

        (BTW, according to your reasoning above, Benneteau should be a bigger threat to Fed, no. Stretched him to 5 sets here, even Hewitt has defeated Fed on the grass)

      • No. It’s relative.

        Bennetteau is two years further from his peak playing years.

        Raonic is two years closer to his peak playing years.

        I don’t believe Fed thinks deciding set tiebreaks are a sound strategy to consistent success.

        #HopeThisHelps
        #YoureWelcome

  48. Rafa should actually be paid an appearance fee at Wimby 2014. He is the only one of the Big 4 with interesting matches.

    • ^ you mean to say Klizan vs Rafa was interesting.
      It would probably go down as one of the worst matches of the tournament.

      • ^^You watched it, so did the whole universe for that matter, waiting (and some hoping) for Rafa to implode.

        That’s major interest.

      • ^^@ritb and @hawkeye
        Spoken like true Rafans

        At least one player was/is playing some good tennis in those 2 matches.
        In Rafa vs Klizan, it was just shabby from both.

      • Well with that “logic”, you’d be better off watching Dancing WIth The Stars than either of those two matches.

        Fed beat another player from his Weak Era.

        #GeezersAndDirtBallers
        #Rigged

      • As if Klizan is some next generation star.. pfft..

        and with your logic, you’d be better off watching Golf or Dancing with (whatever it is)

        #ConsistentlyInconsistentBallBashers

      • Again. You are cherry picking out of context. One step above insults.

        Never said Klizan was. Show me.

        This is what I said:

        Rafa: Raonic, Nishikori
        Fed: pfft.
        Muzza: BabyFed
        Nole: Gulbis

        #HopeThisHelps
        #YoullGetThere
        #PleaseComeAgain

      • Do you even try to read and comprehend what you write..
        I will help you..

        ^^@ritb and @hawkeye
        Spoken like true Rafans

        At least one player was/is playing some good tennis in those 2 matches.
        In Rafa vs Klizan, it was just shabby from both.

        hawkeye63 says:
        June 25, 2014 at 1:38 pm
        Well with that “logic”, you’d be better off watching Dancing WIth The Stars than either of those two matches.

        Fed beat another player from his Weak Era.

        #GeezersAndDirtBallers
        #Rigged

        abhirf says:
        June 25, 2014 at 1:46 pm
        As if Klizan is some next generation star.. pfft..

        and with your logic, you’d be better off watching Golf or Dancing with (whatever it is)

        #ConsistentlyInconsistentBallBashers

        hawkeye63 says:
        June 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm
        Again. You are cherry picking out of context. One step above insults.

        Never said Klizan was. Show me.

        This is what I said:

        Rafa: Raonic, Nishikori
        Fed: pfft.
        Muzza: BabyFed
        Nole: Gulbis

        #HopeThisHelps
        #YoullGetThere
        #PleaseComeAgain

        abhirf says:
        June 25, 2014 at 1:58 pm
        ^ you are doing the cherry picking.
        Did Rafa play Raoni/Nishi.. no.

        #HopeThisHelps
        #YouAreWelcomeAgain

        hawkeye63 says:
        June 25, 2014 at 2:03 pm
        Yes. He’s played both.

        As usual, you don’t seem to have a relevant point.

        #Deflection

        Can I know when did Rafa played Raonic or Nishi in Wimbledon 2014. He’s only played Klizan as far as I can remember.

        As I said
        #CherryPickingHawkeye
        #PoorArguements
        #LosingRegularly

  49. Amy Fetherolf is an idiot, or is just plain jealous of Rafa’s volleying skills:

    RT @AmyFetherolf : “Rafa’s good up at the net, but calling him the best volleyer on tour is laughable.”

  50. The BBC is showing Murray on one channel and a British girl on the other channel, even though her match finished ages ago and showing nothing of Ferrer or Dimi’s matches.

    The BBC should realize that this is an international competition. I also love the way they refer to all the British players by their British ranking and everyone else by their world ranking. What’s the fact that Heather Watson is the British #1 got to do with anything at Wimbledon?

    • Yep. in Canada, if it’s not an American such as Querrey or Isner, now we have the Canadian sports network, replacing the American feeds with the court coverage of Milos and Genie (which admittedly is still better than the US players).

  51. Why is Dimi on CC and Ferrer is shoved to Ct #2. They have put Dimi in the elite abnd even before he’s done anything. So he won a 250 at Queens………:( He is not even in the top 10.

    • you can find those on youtube if you are really interested.

      I can’t share these links due to incompatibility of the device I’m using.
      #TechnicallyHandicapped

      • Very convenient excuse. Just tell us who was playing these amazing shots, when and where so we can do the search.

      • It’s upto you whether you see it as a excuse or well whatever…
        But the reality is I can’t and it doesn’t changes

        If you do want to check those, you may well start with Monfils, Fognini, Dimitrov. Fed, Nole, Muzza, Tsonga etc etc..
        Just search their names with suffix ‘best points’ and you will find plenty of those.

      • Wimbledon of course won’t show ‘those shots’ from other tournaments, no.

        #InabilityToComprehendFlaresAgain
        #PleaseTryAgain

      • @nadline,

        An even better place would be to check out the ATP World Tour channel on youtube and search for the hotshots on the channel.

      • That didn’t require any mind reading.
        As I said you were just doing cherry picking without even reading properly.

        “qualifiers AFTER the fact.’ – That statement probably requires much of a mind reading than mine’s.
        Truly Hilarious

      • Hawkeye out of arguments (as poor as they were).

        (post left blank intentionally)

        #NotWorthyOfAResponse
        #NoSubstanceNorHumour

  52. I’ve noticed that no matter who is playingand who the commies are, they can’t help referring to what Nadal does, what to do against him etc. Amazing!

      • agreed… btw, Muller will also be a tough one for federer… these players are quite some test if the top players get them in the early rounds

      • @vamosrafa,
        haven’t seen Muller play for past 2 yrs.
        Don’t know his current state of game.
        his big-hitting can be dangerous though.

      • @abhirf, that’s the thing about Players like Muller. They are nowhere to be seen but they often come out in the grass reason like worms do in rainfall !

        Muller will play his game. He’l serve really big and hit flat and approach the net. Fed’s return game will have to be clicking. One break of serve is usually enough>

        Fed’s back was not in a good state last year. This year he seems more confident. He’ll handle these challenges much better I suppose

  53. there was a convo above regarding the volleying skills of Rafa,Fed,Muzz, Stepanek..here is my take on it:

    I don’t think federer is that good a volleyer. Federer is a very good volleyer but he has limitations at the net…. Federer has much better reflexes in the forecourt than rafa…so does Muzz…

    But, Rafa to me, is the best when it comes to hitting touch/drop volleys..he does that much better than fed… rafa does not have great punch volleys and he does not like to play totally reflex volleys….But when he moves in with purpose, he has better volleys than Both Fed and Muzz

    Fed can look like an excellent volleyer but sometimes he looks like a very confused net player ! That happens esp against rafa when fed is out of sorts…

    Mcenroe thinks rafa is the best volleyer among the big 4 !

    Regarding fed vs rafa, I think rafa has much better touch volleys while federer has the better punch and instinctive volleys…

    Stepanek is a very good NET RUSHER but not necessarily the best of volleyers… Tsonga has really good volleys too !

      • hahaha… I mean hitting though the volleys lol..

        rafa often makes too thin a contact on his volleys and that costs him sometimes when going for the open court….

      • hahah yeah I can see that 😛

        and yes, Rafa going to the net more often would be great because that would mean rafa is playing very aggressive tennis… It’s very very rare for rafa to venture the net on neutral balls….he can do that on mid-court balls but not often….rafa’s improvement on volleys and net play is MIND-BLOWING.

      • Agreed, but most of that improvement happened years ago IMO.

        He is too conservative still and needs to end points earlier by coming to net more often when the opportunities present themselves.

  54. All of a sudden my comments are not appearing in the Recent Comments Column and one is under moderation…

    Hey Ricky, are you Sean Randall in disguise?

    #RafanTribulations

  55. Has there been any more speculation by the commentators about the ND wrist. Or has that subject finally been laid to rest?

  56. Johnny Mac says Rafa should have been top seed at Wimby………..

    Now there’s a man who knows his tennis.

  57. RT @Wimbledon: “Ferrer, who reached the R16 at the last 16 Slams, is OUT. The 7th seed falls to Andrey Kuznetsov, who beats a top 10 player for the 1st time”

  58. The last thing I read about Ferrer’s illness was that it had lingered for over 10 days and it included significant stomach distress. He was having a series of tests done but I don’t remember seeing anything after that. It might’ve been a factor in this loss.

  59. I am losing patience with the BBC.. The constant interruptions to bring updates from other matches is getting to me.

    Thanks to Hawkeye for introducing us to definish.com one can watch all the scores on other courts while keeping an eye on this less than exciting Centre Court match.

  60. One BBC commentator refers to Djoko as the ‘would be champion’, he was introduced as the favourite by JMac similarly the same commentator kept referring to him as the favourite at RG.

  61. Chapeau to old Steps hanging on in there to the bitter end.

    Berdy takes the TB to go 2:1 up on Tomic. He’s been making heavy weather of his matches so far.

  62. All he had to do was win two last points on his own serve.

    This has a lot to do with why he lost to Stanisfluke in the AO semis and why he’s 1-5 in his last six slam finals.

    He will not win Wimbly.

    #FireBB

  63. https://twitter.com/BBC_Tennis/status/481854357327986689

    Uncle Toni believes Nadal, who spent eight months out with a knee injury following the defeat by Rosol, is in better shape this year than he has been for two years for the rematch against the Czech.

    “It’s a different Rafa Nadal than two years ago,” he said. “A better Rafa Nadal. In 2012, he had many problems when he arrived at Wimbledon.
    “Rafa struggled in every practice, he couldn’t go down on his knees, which is important on grass, and his mentality was not good enough for that reason.
    “But now he has good movement and not much pain. He is the number one in the world and that should give him some confidence.
    “Of course, Rafa can lose because Rosol is a good player and he has a good serve, but I hope Rafa is good enough to beat him.”

  64. oh come on, ok you can argue that fed’s prime was not in a ‘weak era’ but if you are comparing what fed went through in his prime and what nadal/djokovic have been going through, then OBVIOUSLY that era was much much weaker. 2008 onward and then esp 2010-11 onward it was the GOLDEN PERIOD… Lendl once said he would struggle big time in this golden age of the Big 4…countless examples of former players saying that..

    I don’t think its a science….the ‘big 4’ has been the most lethal big 4 ever perhaps ! in terms of talent, fitness, consistency and everything else..

    Djokovic alone is > Roddick+hewitt+safin

      • good to hear from you NNY 🙂 thanks

        besides, look at djokovic’s consistency ! he is so damn consistent on slam level…he has 6 slams and he is a bigger a player than that!

        Imagine winning a grand slam where you are to beat djokovic, federer back to back and imagine a grand slam where you have to beat Roddick,hewitt back to back ! please, don;t tell me its not a MUCH weaker era !

        the problem was that NONE of fed’s competitors was a complete package, NONE ! hewitt was just a much downgraded version of djokovic and even Murray… Roddick was mentally nowhere as strong as these giants and he had weaknesses in his game….Safin, well, is one of the perfect examples of being a pure waste of talent ! Same goes for nalby ! There was a time l

    • Very commendable sportsmanship from Novak to concede that point to Step. This match is much tighter than I thought it would be. I knew Step could be trouble, but didn’t think it would be this close.

      • The top players concede points all the time. Rafa rubs marks off all the time and invites the umpire to inspect the line even after he’s been awarded the point.

      • no….I have not seen anyone concede this big a point… and this was quite different, the umpire had called a replay of the point but djokovic awarded stepanek the point !

    • @vamosrafa,
      but Djoko and even Muzza have said it clearly no that they would not have been the same players today if it hadn’t been for Fed.

      Besides, they still struggle against Fed when he is hardly playing anything good these days. What’s the guarantee that they would have beaten him in the slams in his prime??

      I have no issue against the GOLDEN PERIOD which I think is true but if you start comparing other periods with this period than every era will be relatively weak, no.

      And if this GOLDEN PERIOD is really the criteria to judge a player, then Nole should be the best, no. Won 5 slams (= to Rafa), reached most Slam finals, Won the most no. of masters, Won most no. of YEC’s.

      This whole comparison thing is a dumb stuff.

    • Also, Djokovic may be > Hewitt+Safin+Roddick. But was he good enough to beat Fed in those slams in his prime, when he is losing so many finals. Highly doubtful..
      Muzza.. well, he’s still not close to Djokovic, wouldn’t know if he could have presented any better challenge.

      The biggest indicator is Rafa. Nole and Muzza are not able to beat Rafa who is not even close to his young days game. How would have they beaten against Fed in his prime??

      “Lendl once said he would struggle big time in this golden age of the Big 4…countless examples of former players saying that.”
      How would have these big 4 performed if they had to play in Lendl’s era with those racquets? tennis has not been the same, no.

    • Why? Novak is quite fit. He’s not going to be tired out from a match like this. In fact, it could be quite the opposite. Since he hasn’t played any matches prior to Wimbledon, this match could give him the match play that he didn’t get prior to the tournament.

    • lol…you’l never give djokovic credit, ed 😛 it was an awesome display of sportsmanship, nothing else… when the point is so big, you cannot pretend …

      • At RG IN 2011, it was set point to Lorenzi against Rafa and Rafa conceded a point to him and has done it countless times. Djoker and Rafa do it all the time much more than Fed and Muzz.

      • You’re right. It was a display of good sportsmanship and it is curmudgeonly of me to say it was a calculated risk.

      • Rafa never played Lorenzi at RG in 2011 !, are you talking about rome?

        yes, rafa also concedes points… but this one here by djokovic was quite remarkable… cleaning a ball mark on clay before the umpire comes is good sportsmanship but in that scenario its delaying the inevitable because the umpire will eventually check…rafa , has however, conceded some points portraying great spirit..

        I agree that rafa and nole concede the most points…

      • @vamosrafa,

        You are absolutely correct. That was a crucial point in the match. If Novak was broken at that point, then Steps would be serving to win the fourth set and send it into a fifth set. In this instance, I give Novak credit for doing that.

        Of course, Rafa concedes points. He is a great sportsman. But what does Novak conceding a critical point in a match have to do with Rafa/

      • Maybe Nole felt bad for when his racquet went over the net vs Muzz and he didn’t concede the point and is now trying to make up for it.

  65. Please tell me that they won’t have to close the roof for Rafa’s match!

    Rafa needs to take it to Rosol and dispense with him once and for all!

  66. ^^Hawkeye, you and I think alike. When I saw the Step/Berdy bit on another website, the old SNL Martin/Aykroyd skits were the first thing I thought of. Those wild and crazy Czechs….

  67. Play of the Day belonged to Steps. So would have been a good match, no.

    #HoldsEyeLogic
    #YouAreWelcomeAgain (I’m bored now though, :p)
    #HopeThisDoesn’tContinue

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. All in at the All-England Club: A look at the unheralded stars of Wimbledon 2014 – The Grandstand

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




Skip to toolbar