How other tournaments responded to the French Open going rogue

Without consulting anyone, the French Tennis Federation recently announced that due to the ongoing coronavirus crisis it was moving the French Open from its traditional May-June slot to Sept. 20-Oct. 4.

“Without consulting anyone” is one problem. Another plainly obvious issue is that a the new dates conflict with a whole host of previously scheduled tournaments. Across both the ATP and WTA tours, events in St. Petersburg, Metz, Chengdu, Zhuhai, Sofia, Guangzhou, Seoul, Tokyo, Wuhan, Tashkent, and the Laver Cup in Boston were–and still are–on the either the late September or early October calendar.

“This announcement came as a surprise to us and our partners, Tennis Australia, the U.S. Open, and the ATP,” Laver Cup officials wrote. “It raises many questions and we are assessing the situation. At this time, we want [our fans, sponsors etc.] to know that we intend to hold the Laver Cup 2020 as currently scheduled.”

Of course, the Laver Cup is really an exhibition event that features only 12 players. Far more important is that the French Open is now scheduled to begin exactly one month after the U.S. Open ends. That’s right; one week in between two majors. And two majors on two different surfaces! You just cannot make this stuff up.

“These are unprecedented time…and we are assessing all of our options, including the possibility of moving the tournament to a later date,” the USTA wrote in a press release following the Roland Garros announcement, before throwing some obvious shade at the clay-court major. “At a time when the world is coming together, we recognize that such a decision should not be made unilaterally and therefore the USTA would only do so in full consultation with the other Grand Slam tournaments, the WTA and ATP, the ITF and our partners, including the Laver Cup.”

Wimbledon faces no conflict with the French Open, but it is dealing with a race against time. A late June start seems tenuous at best given the world’s current chaos.

“At the heart of our decision-making is our commitment to the health and safety of our members, staff, and the public, and we are grateful to the government and public health authorities for their advice and support,” said Richard Lewis, chief executive of the All-England Lawn and Tennis Club.

“While we continue to plan for The Championships at this time, it remains a continuously evolving situation and we will act responsibly, in the best interests of wider society. We thank all of our members, staff, players, partners, contractors, and the public for their patience and trust as we continue to navigate this unprecedented global challenge.”

7 Comments on How other tournaments responded to the French Open going rogue

    • Will the pandemic stop in 2020? Until the world medical profession can cope with the number of coronavirus cases there will be no tennis because no government will allow mass gatherings, mass travel, etc.

      It’s a bit odd since singles tennis is one of the few sports that forbids close contact between the competitors, aside from the traditional end of match handshake. One could arrange for a tournament with tv cameras, no spectators, pay per view, but even getting the players gathered would be a challenge since pro tennis is a very international sport. Roland Garros with only French players? Well, maybe the French would watch it. Doubt the rest of the world would.

  1. I haven’t seen (read/heard) any tournament react to the French Open’s postponement.
    Rescheduling RG doesn’t impact the USO. It’s obvious that representing the interests of the Laver Cup was the reason for issuing the USTA statement. As for Tennis Australia, it’s one of the Laver Cup’s founders and represents its own interests.
    Wikipedia: ¤¤ Roger Federer’s management company, TEAM8, Brazilian businessman and former Davis Cup player Jorge Paulo Lemann, and Tennis Australia partnered to create the Laver Cup. ¤¤

    https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1240046495367401472

    Grand slam tournaments are not mandatory events for the ATP players. Every player is free to not participate in the FO and play in other tournaments, instead of playing at RG. Several ATP Challengers have always been held during grand slam tournaments. Fed ruled out his participation in the FO a long time ago – after having knee surgery. So, nothing prevents the LC organizers from holding their event.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




Skip to toolbar