Wimbledon semifinal expert picks: Sinner vs. Djokovic

Jannik Sinner

Expert picks are back for Friday’s second Wimbledon semifinal between Jannik Sinner and Novak Djokovic. The winner will battle either Alexander Zverev or Arthur Fery for the title. A three-team panel makes its predictions.

Ricky: Djokovic is way too big of an underdog in this matchup. He can never be discounted from any Grand Slam match, as he continues to excel on the big stage in the latter stages of his career. He also won his most recent meeting with Sinner in a five-setter in the 2026 Australian Open semis. And that’s why I think Friday’s showdown will be competitive — I don’t think Djokovic is going to pull off the outright upset. With two days off, the 39-year-old’s five-set marathon against Felix Auger-Aliassime should not be decisive factor moving forward. But it also certainly doesn’t help. Although Djokovic’s AO victory over the Italian was impressive, Sinner should not forget that had previously won five times in a row in their head-to-head series. He also should not forget that he is the best player in the world — by far. The top seed hasn’t played like it this fortnight, but he also wasn’t required to through his first five matches. I expect Djokovic to bring out the best in Sinner. Sinner in 4: 6-7(5), 6-3, 6-3, 6-4.

Cheryl: Sinner’s aura of invincibility was badly dented after his physical collapse in the second round of the French Open to Juan Manuel Cerundolo. He was a game away from an easy straight-set win when he suffered from an extreme reaction to the Paris heat. If it’s possible for a world No. 1 to quietly move through a draw, Sinner has done it. The Italian has gotten better with each passing round in London, but there seems to be this sense that he could just fall apart for no discernible reason again at any time. By contrast, the 39-year-old GOAT is still out there winning five-hour matches. His inspired performance against Auger-Aliassime was another chapter in the Stuff of Legends book he has been writing for two decades. Still, you have to wonder how his close to 40-year-old body is going to fare in the late stages of a grueling fortnight and a record-breaking match against FAA in the quarters. Djokovic nabbed Sinner somewhat unexpectedly at the Australian Open, but I have a hard time picking against the title favorite given how he is playing right now. Sinner in 5: 7-5, 4-6, 6-2, 3-6, 7-5.

Jannik Sinner


Pete (Tennis Acumen): Nearly 35 years ago, 39-year-old Jimmy Connors reached the semifinals of the 1991 U.S. Open. At the time, as well as in the following decades, such an achievement seemed unlikely to be duplicated on the ATP Tour. Leave it to Djokovic to match the feat, currently at Wimbledon. Prior to the semifinals of the Australian Open earlier this year, Djokovic had not been able to solve Sinner’s game — he dropped 13 of the previous 15 sets they played in five matches heading into Melbourne. His come-from-behind five-set win there restored faith in his efforts against the Italian, but a five-hour victory in the quarters on Tuesday at the All-England Club will do his body no favors in this semi. Aside from a significantly more difficult-than-expected opening match against Miomir Kecmanovic that went the distance, Sinner has now won 14 consecutive sets — despite four of those going to tiebreakers. Djokovic is the first seeded player Sinner will face in London. The seven-time Wimbledon champion has won just a single one of his five matches in straight sets against significantly stronger competition. Full credit to Djokovic for reaching the semis, although his efforts in reaching this point of the tournament will be too much for him against the defending champ and current world No. 1. Sinner in 4: 6-3, 5-7, 6-3, 7-6(4).

948
WWW: Sinner vs. Djokovic?

20 Comments on Wimbledon semifinal expert picks: Sinner vs. Djokovic

  1. I think Djokovic would have had better chances if the match had been scheduled for the afternoon, as is traditional for the players who had the extra day. Because Sinner + heat and it’s hot and getting hotter in London. Plus they are more likely to close the roof in the late match, which again favours Sinner. This is what I haven’t liked all year about scheduling decisions, medical time-out decisions and roof-closing decisions. Maybe all coincidence but still feels wrong.

  2. I suppose one could take the perspective that IF Djokovic manages to repeat his feat and the result of his last meeting with Sinner DESPITE his mammoth QF five-setter vs FAA, it would leave him more in the tank vs Zverev in the final (unless a late night offsets less heat exhaustion, which isn’t such a problem for him anyway compared to Sinner).

    I’m sure Zverev would have liked to see his contending final opponents battle it out for five in the full midday heat though.

    Unless a miracle happens and Fery beats him.

    No matter which way it’s diced, it’s TWO Everests left to climb for Djokovic to win Wimbledon though. The first because of the opponent, and not getting a crack at him in midday heat. The second because he’s already done so much climbing this tournament.

    • Taking for granted that Zverev will beat Fery, which isn’t necessarily a gimmee given how well Fery has played

      • True. But Zverev has been playing better than Cobolli. I think the de Minaur scoreline made Cobolli look better than he actually played; I saw that match. Not de Minaur’s finest.

        I concede Fery has nothing to lose, is skyhigh on adrenaline and mettle, and has chances if he’s A1 and Zverev plays below his recent efforts! The British would certainly love it and may help scream him to victory.

  3. Time catches up with us all unfortunately
    That was like Novak saying goodbye .
    Though Im happy for Sinner he’s the new Nole

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.