First round
Murray over Bublik in 3, Brown over Sousa in 4
Vesely over Marchenko in 3, Fognini over Tursunov in 3
Kyrgios over Herbert in 3, Paire over Dutra Silva in 3
Shapovalov over Janowicz in 5, Pouille over Jaziri in 3
Tsonga over Norrie in 3, Lu over Bolelli in 5
Basilashvili over Berlocq in 4, Querrey over Fabbiano in 3
Anderson over Verdasco in 5, Seppi over Gombos in 3
Haas over Bemelmans in 3, Wawrinka over Medvedev in 3
Nadal over Millman in 3, Young over Istomin in 4
Whittington over Monteiro in 3, Khachanov over Kuznetsov in 4
Karlovic over Bedene in 4, Dzumhur over Olivo in 5
Rosol over Laaksonen in 4, Muller over Fucsovics in 3
Nishikori over Cecchinato in 3, Stakhovsky over Benneteau in 4
Copil over Gojowyczk in 4, Bautista Agut over Haider-Maurer in 3
Johnson over Kicker in 3, Albot over Bagnis in 4
Mayer over Troicki in 5, Cilic over Kohlschreiber in 4
Raonic over Struff in 3, Mahut over Youzhny in 4
Rublev over Travaglia in 3, Thompson over Ramos-Vinolas in 4
Sock over Garin in 3, Bellucci over Ofner in 4
Haase over Tiafoe in 4, A. Zverev over Donskoy in 3
Dimitrov over Schwartzman in 3, Baghdatis over Ward in 3
Granollers over Sela in 3, Isner over Fritz in 4
M. Zverev over Tomic in 5, Kukushkin over Daniel in 5
Lajovic over Tsitsipas in 4, Federer over Dolgopolov in 3
Pospisil over Thiem in 4, Simon over Jarry in 4
Donaldson over Tipsarevic in 4, Zeballos over Lorenzi in 4
Gasquet over Ferrer in 4, Darcis over Berankis in 3
Harrison over Coric in 5, Berdych over Chardy in 4
Monfils over Brands in 4, Edmund over Ward in 3
Sugita over Klein in 4, Lopez over Mannarino in 5
Del Potro over Kokkinakis in 3, Estrella Burgos over Gulbis in 3
Escobedo over Pavlasek in 4, Djokovic over Klizan in 3
Second round
Murray over Brown in 4
Vesely over Fognini in 4
Kyrgios over Paire in 5
Pouille over Shapovalov in 3
Tsonga over Lu in 4
Querrey over Basilashvili in 3
Anderson over Seppi in 4
Wawrinka over Haas in 4
Nadal over Young in 4
Khachanov over Whittington in 3
Karlovic over Dzumhur in 4
Muller over Rosol in 4
Stakhovsky over Nishikori in 4
Bautista Agut over Copil in 4
Johnson over Albot in 3
Cilic over Mayer in 4
Raonic over Mahut in 4
Thompson over Rublev in 5
Sock over Bellucci in 3
A. Zverev over Haase in 4
Dimitrov over Baghdatis in 4
Isner over Granollers in 4
M. Zverev over Kukushkin in 3
Federer over Lajovic in 3
Pospisil over Simon in 4
Donaldson over Zeballos in 4
Gasquet over Darcis in 3
Berdych over Harrison in 4
Edmund over Monfils in 5
Lopez over Sugita in 3
Del Potro over Estrella Burgos in 3
Djokovic over Escobedo in 3
Third round
Murray over Vesely in 4
Pouille over Kyrgios in 4
Querrey over Tsonga in 5
Wawrinka over Anderson in 4
Nadal over Khachanov in 4
Muller over Karlovic in 4
Bautista Agut over Stakhovsky in 4
Cilic over Johnson in 3
Raonic over Thompson in 3
A. Zverev over Sock in 4
Dimitrov over Isner in 4
Federer over M. Zverev in 3
Pospisil over Donaldson in 3
Gasquet over Berdych in 4
Lopez over Edmund in 4
Djokovic over Del Potro in 4
Fourth round
Pouille over Murray in 4
Wawrinka over Querrey in 4
Muller over Nadal in 5
Cilic over Bautista Agut in 3
Raonic over A. Zverev in 4
Federer over Dimitrov in 4
Gasquet over Pospisil in 5
Djokovic over Lopez in 4
Quarterfinals
Wawrinka over Pouille in 4
Cilic over Muller in 3
Federer over Raonic in 4
Djokovic over Gasquet in 3
Semifinals
Cilic over Wawrinka in 4
Federer over Djokovic in 4
Final
Federer over Cilic in 4
[polldaddy poll=9780082]
[polldaddy poll=9780109]
[polldaddy poll=9780111]
[polldaddy poll=9780113]
[polldaddy poll=9780115]
I think i have to take my cow secretly to graze the grass at CC tonight in order to make a job easier for Rafa…Blink!blink!…now,that’s a good idea!!
Roger is the favorite and from the other half we could get either Murray or Warinka into the finals, however this analysis picks Cilic to make it to the finals, which I don’t agree with but it is not impossible … http://www.138mph.com/wimbledon-mens-draw-unraveled/
Murray beats Djokovic in 5 sets in the final.
Djokovic goes up 10 levels against Fed and his ability to take time away like genius in Melbourne won’t work against Djokovic like it did against Nadal.
Nadal can’t beat Murray on grass in 2017.
Djokovic will be tired after a very tough 5 setter in the semi.
Hmm .I don’t know about Rafa going out to Cilic.He’ playing some of the best tennis of his life,from fast hard court to clay.But he does have a poor record at Wimby lately.
But ,another Fedal final seems about due so I went for it.
Looks like It’s good gonna get blown out with a way he’s playing. What a waste of space
Kyrgios
Kyrgios is a clown god damn it.
Who’s Kyrgios?
Wawrinka is OUT.
Not his best surface, no surprise really after the shelllacking he got in the RG final. The man’s spirit is broken.
losing in the FO final has absolutely nothing to do with it
Yeah Stan is just bad on grass lol. And it’s the first round where is most vulnerable. Like I said in my daily picks, I thought he either loses to Medvedev or wins then makes a solid run.
My opinion stands, absolutely it has an affect on motivation. Being historic call average on grass but having his spirit broken equals an early exit. He might come good again at the US Open.
The RG final was the first grand slam final Stan has lost and he didn’t just lose, he got belted and its his favourite surface. For someone that thrives on motivation, it could put a major dent in his career. He’ll either bounce back at the US or Australian Open or it could be the end of him.
I have to agree with Ricky: I highly doubt that Stan’s spirit was broken by Rafa. Losing against Rafa at RG is something which will happen with a certainty of almost 100. Rafa lost there only twice after all since 2005. If Stan wasn’t able to take this loss like a man then he is neither Stan The Man nor the Stanimal 😉
Stan just isn’t very good on grass and might have been slightly hurt, too. And Medvedev can play on grass. That’s all there is to it. No need for deep soul searching…I’m sure Stan wasn’t deluding himself that his (rather short) row of undefeated slam finals would continue for sure – especially since Rafa’s row of being undefeated in RG finals was statistically much more impressive anyway.
Agree to disagree
Accepted 🙂 None of us can look into Stan’s competitive soul.
You can when you understand sport psychology and you’ve played competitive sport at a high level for many years. Couch experts, not so much.
JC, you are a couch expert compared to Wawrinka.
Wawrinka going out early at Wimbledon is the norm (regardless of French Open result), not the exception.
Can’t beat a troll.
Jim this loss honestly wouldn’t have surprised me even if Stan won the French. Or if he simply tested Nadal in the final.
JC, having competed at a high level doesn’t grant you necessarily any insights into another pro athlet’s mind. Every athlet ticks differently after all – especially if you don’t know him personally. And being an athlet yourself doesn’t automatically buy you empathy.
I think your theory concerning Wawrinka’s first round loss probably tells us more about yourself than about Wawrinka 😉
Jelousy and envy is a course. Why else the personal attacks every time I post on this site? Talk about an unprofessional web business.
Just let people excites their opinions and move on or are you too small for that?
SFs
Murray over Cilic in 5
Federer over Del Potro in 4
Final
Federer over Murray in 4
I agree with littlefoot’s take on Stan’s loss and the misguided reaction to it on the part of Jim Courier.
We don’t know these players and no one should presume to think that they know to any certainty what is behind any early round loss at a slam. Stan was dealing with a knee problem and that affected his ability to play well.
Calling someone who disagrees with you a troll, says more about you than anything else.
Hey, NNY, the whole issue isn’t important enough to get excited about – but thanks anyway 🙂
Stans not bad on grass , he’s basically a slow starter . And he was injured . The match a couple of years ago with Gasquet was a gem.
You right you right. He’s just a slow starter at all slams basically. Grass is just where he’s most vulnerable.
My opinion is Wawrinka is affected by his loss in the RG final. Accept other people’s opinion without the personal attacks.
Is this site run by teenagers or something?
The last time I checked, Ricky Dimon was not a teenager!
Calling someone a troll is a personal attack. If you can’t handle others disagreeing with you without resorting to personal insults, then you are the one with the problem.
Where’s Joe Smith? At least he could have a respectful discussion even when not in agreement